Shall we go back to your fist statement after the NM edit.Originally Posted by Tribesman
The United States only stated it was spying, wrote an apology for spying and then withdrew said apology as soon as the sailors were return, nothing was ever agreed concerning the terroritial limits- which is exactly what I stated earlier and is historially correct. It seems your having difficultly understanding, what I stated because of your own desire to argue over something I never stated. If you read the actual history the United States wrote a written statement about spying, not about terrorial waters or violating those same waters.
Now where did I argue that the United States was not within the terrorial limits of North Korea? It seems your arguing up the wrong tree once again, all I have stated is that the United States did not agree about being within the terrorial waters of North Korea, nor did they agree with the declared 50 mile zone. It seems your looking to make me look foolish from your own inability to read what was actually stated.
I am rather amused from your effort. It seems your attempting to pick a fight over words that were never stated.![]()
![]()
Tsk tsk - again I never made such an arguement. Your effort to troll for a fight is rather disconnected from the reality of my statements.Now then Red amonst the gripes that the crew of that vessel had about lack of armament , not getting a radio call telling them about the changes to the situation in Korea , the bad general state of the vessel , the navy not backing them up (and even recalling the back up) they wouldn't happen to also moan about a faulty navigation system would they![]()
![]()
Bookmarks