Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Question Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    Now, the unit description of the hastati, princepeis, and triarii talk about how the Roman armies marched in three rows with gaps in between, and I was just wondering if I'm picturing it correctly. To illustrate what I'm thinking, I quicky came up with an (admittedly craptastic) diagram:



    H=Hastati, P= Princepeis, T= Triarii

    Is this basically what was going on?

  2. #2
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    Yes, basically, bear in mind Hastati and Princepes have the same size maniples and there are the same number of maniples of each in the legion.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  3. #3

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    That is how I interpret it too. Except I tend to form the Hastati as a slightly thinner, but solid line.

    This is because I've read about Scipio's (I think?) order to 'open' up the maniples as a counter for elephants, plus the gaps are only needed in the posterior ranks to allow the safe withdrawal of the Hastati.

    You could argue for the velites retreating though the line I suppose, but a solid line is better in my opinion for the initial clash.

    Does anyone know of any sources that support or disprove this possibility?

    Also, what of the flanks? Assuming (and I know it's an assumption) that the allied soldiers are arranged as the Romans are, isn't there a Principe strong and Principe weak side? And the same for the Hastati?
    Last edited by Maeran; 03-22-2007 at 20:08.

  4. #4
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    It's an open first line. If it isn't then the princepes will have trouble passing through the Hastati as well.

    I don't understand what you mean about a strong and weak side. The velites and cavalry covered the flanks though.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  5. #5
    Sage of Bread Member Rilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EB Tavern, Professing my superiority.
    Posts
    932

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    And didn't the romans sort of feign retreat to give the idea that there enemies were advancing but were actually just moving forward into fresher troups.

  6. #6
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    I don't think it was a formal 'feigned retreat,' more of a tactical withdraw for the part where the both the Hastati and Principles withdrew behind the Triarii to push them forward ala Hoplite tactics.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  7. #7

    Default Re: Roman Quinquirex (or however its spelled) question

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
    It's an open first line. If it isn't then the princepes will have trouble passing through the Hastati as well.

    I don't understand what you mean about a strong and weak side. The velites and cavalry covered the flanks though.

    What I meant by a weak and strong flank is this

    Assuming a chequerboard formation

    Velite_______ H__________H_________Velite
    Cav_____P_________P_______________Cav
    Alae?_______________T (spread out)___Alae?

    The left here is strong in Principes but weak in Hastati, the right is the opposite.
    This is a result of equal quantities in a strict chequerboard arrangement. Which is why I think the line closed formation into a solid line.
    Last edited by Maeran; 03-23-2007 at 01:28.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO