BTW, I play on "Large" unitsize and of course as Roman :)
BTW, I play on "Large" unitsize and of course as Roman :)
I remember a Heroic Victory as Romanii played on huge with 5-2 odds against me , i got like 2-3 thousands kills and my general was a vanquisher and everything and this is not the only example, I too believe Imperator trait and thus Triumphs are broken.
You Know I think so too because my general has even "seen the elephant" and his soliders wont name him imperator or get a trimuph
Question: Shouldn't it be Battle Odds < 0.7 and not Battle Odds > 0.7? I would think that > 0.7 means odds of winning at more than 7 to 10 wouldn't it.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
I got a general named imperitor after beating 2 Carthage armies at once in a battle with the odds slightly against him, took some major casualties since I was trying to fight in a more Roman manner At the same time he got uncomfortable supervisor strangely enough. :)
He never got named for a triumph though, damn senate...
I do not know how it works, but I took it directly from the datafile.Originally Posted by antisocialmunky
I also do not know what "and Trait BattlePoints > 3" actually means, so here can be problem:)
My dude is well on his way; he just has to be named Imperator, apparently.
I'm ready for an epic faceoff with their last good army, so I should get it.
My brand new Polybian Roman army led by Hannibal vs. Carthage's huge army of elites led by noone (I killed all their generaling family members), I hope the odds are still slightly in their favor.
OK, I fought several battles, where I fulfilled requirements 1.000 + soldiers per side and with odds against me, I even tried several with odds for me, but absolutely nothing![]()
I do not understand... if only it would be random, but it is not...![]()
Bookmarks