Results 1 to 30 of 58

Thread: Roman Triumph?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Revenant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    198

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    BTW, I play on "Large" unitsize and of course as Roman :)

  2. #2
    Closet Celtophile Member Redmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    3,740

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    I remember a Heroic Victory as Romanii played on huge with 5-2 odds against me , i got like 2-3 thousands kills and my general was a vanquisher and everything and this is not the only example, I too believe Imperator trait and thus Triumphs are broken.

  3. #3
    Member Member sgsandor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    in new jersey
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    You Know I think so too because my general has even "seen the elephant" and his soliders wont name him imperator or get a trimuph

  4. #4
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    Question: Shouldn't it be Battle Odds < 0.7 and not Battle Odds > 0.7? I would think that > 0.7 means odds of winning at more than 7 to 10 wouldn't it.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  5. #5

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    I got a general named imperitor after beating 2 Carthage armies at once in a battle with the odds slightly against him, took some major casualties since I was trying to fight in a more Roman manner At the same time he got uncomfortable supervisor strangely enough. :)
    He never got named for a triumph though, damn senate...

  6. #6
    Member Member Revenant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    198

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky
    Question: Shouldn't it be Battle Odds < 0.7 and not Battle Odds > 0.7? I would think that > 0.7 means odds of winning at more than 7 to 10 wouldn't it.
    I do not know how it works, but I took it directly from the datafile.

    I also do not know what "and Trait BattlePoints > 3" actually means, so here can be problem:)

  7. #7

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    My dude is well on his way; he just has to be named Imperator, apparently.

    I'm ready for an epic faceoff with their last good army, so I should get it.

    My brand new Polybian Roman army led by Hannibal vs. Carthage's huge army of elites led by noone (I killed all their generaling family members), I hope the odds are still slightly in their favor.

  8. #8
    Member Member Revenant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    198

    Default Re: Roman Triumph?

    OK, I fought several battles, where I fulfilled requirements 1.000 + soldiers per side and with odds against me, I even tried several with odds for me, but absolutely nothing

    I do not understand... if only it would be random, but it is not...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO