The not keyword

[Carl]

It definetly works with the example yopu gave in the code tags. Also the anti-trait fixes actually rely on the not code working rigt in relation to traits.

On the other hand, thanks for the warnings about it not working in every case, I didn't know that and it would explain a few oddball things I noticed.

Thanks.

[alpaca]

That's fine if it works for your keywords. I'd just change the logic token in the future instead of negating the whole thing to be on the safe side

The only thing I can definitely say it doesn't work with is I_CompareCounter because that's the only one i tested properly.

[Carl]

That's fine if it works for your keywords. I'd just change the logic token in the future instead of negating the whole thing to be on the safe side

Of course, thats why i'm Glad of the warning. I was just pointing out that in the case of some things, we can't do it without the not tag.

I think (don't quote me on this though), that any condition that starts with "I" is unaffected as I don't think a couple of lines relating to:

and not IsFactionLeader

AND

and not IsFactionHeir

are not working right. A few others too I suspect.

[alpaca]

The problem only ever applies to keywords using logic tokens as parameters (i.e. something like "=", "!=", "<", etc.)
It definitely should work with the other keywords.