TA, I understand that you/ye might be exasperated by now to have always to be explaining your choices and decisions. Still, I have some very serious concerns about the KH that some other people seem to share. EB is a realism mod, and while I would never expect a perfectly accurate model of the world in 272 bc, and would never criticize you for not achieving perfect accuracy, it is still legitimate to ask if the KH is the best, most accurate depiction of the Greeks within the limits of what the RTW game can be modded to do. I am sorry, but I do not necessarily think that that is the case.
I know that you were trying to point out that many of the other factions in EB are in the same boat as the KH, but I think that there is a difference between Baktria and Haydasan on the one hand and EB's KH on the other. That difference is best expressed as applying a thought-experiment: can you reasonably imagine, without too much stretching of historical possibilities, such a faction achieving the goals set out for them under the 'victory' conditions? Could history really have happened that way? I can answer that question positively for Baktria, but not for the Koinon Hellenon. I just can't bring myself to believe that Sparta, Athens and Rhodes, given the conditons in EB, could ever have held together for long, much less pursued an aggressive foreign policy.

I do not expect, and am not asking, you to change anything at this point. Personally, I think that the Greeks should be represented in the game by a non-playable emerging faction of the Achaean League that pops out ca. 252 BC or so (I may have the exact date wrong), or by an Aitolian league faction with only Thermon as their starting point. Maybe an eventual mini-mod? In the meantime, I just don't play the Greeks.