Results 1 to 30 of 67

Thread: question on dates b.c to ad

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Quote Originally Posted by Ignoramus
    Now those are pretty lame excuses for changing it. However, there is an irony that they can't remove the division of BC and AD, because otherwise famous dates like 1066 and 1415 would be different.
    We should just add 4.5 billion to all of our years.

    Happy New Year 4,500,002,007 everyone!!!

  2. #2

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    You'll see some new ways of dating things in the next build, for those of you interested in using dates in AAR's and such especially - but the date at the bottom right of the screen will remain as it is currently.

  3. #3
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheep
    We should just add 4.5 billion to all of our years.

    Happy New Year 4,500,002,007 everyone!!!
    Considering most religious fundies believe in the literal intrepretation of the old testament...meaning the world was created by the Abrahamic God(s)
    ~7000 years ago.



    Quote Originally Posted by Ignoramus
    Exactly, that's the reason why they are trying to change it. They hate anything Christian, because: (a) They hate Christianity. (b) They claim it offends other religions.

    Now those are pretty lame excuses for changing it. However, there is an irony that they can't remove the division of BC and AD, because otherwise famous dates like 1066 and 1415 would be different.
    How about because people think AD means "after death" and BC & AD aren't accurate anyways because Jesus wasn't born on the year 1. Also, BC & AD don't have the year 0, so we actually have to add a year...this is the year 2008 AD/CE technically
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  4. #4
    Guest Boyar Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    MIA, Florida
    Posts
    1,656

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    Considering most religious fundies believe in the literal intrepretation of the old testament...meaning the world was created by the Abrahamic God(s)
    ~7000 years ago.




    God(s)??

    What do you mean I thought only one?

    Click to see funny Arab people!!

  5. #5
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Quote Originally Posted by K COSSACK
    God(s)??

    What do you mean I thought only one?

    Click to see funny Arab people!!
    Technically, the Trinity of the father, the son, and the holy spirit is one God. However, I hear many people consider Hinduism a polytheistic religion, even though Hinduism has the same concept - many dieties that make up the face of one God, Brahaman.

    So if you consider Hinduism polytheistic, that applies to Christianity as well.
    Needless to say, this is up for debate...
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  6. #6
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    5000 BC depending on your interpretation as the intepretation of day can be a literal day or a figrative day -> see Genesis 2:4.

    Technically the Trinity of the father, the son, and the holy spirit is the result of religious fusion caused by the spread of Christianity as a state religion. The Trinities of gods in Asia and Europe were given a update to 'Christianize' them when the government officially sactioned Christianity as the de facto state religion.

    That's why you have Mary mother of god and the divine Trinity of father son and holy spirit. That's why the birth of Christ was set to be in the middle of the Levant winter during the darkest days of winter and there is an Easter bunny - a old hold over from the fertility symbol days.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  7. #7
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    ^ yup, 5000 BCE = ~ 7000 years ago
    don't forget that Christmas is actually a pagan Celtic holiday. :)

    Averni/Aedui with Christmas trees :)
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  8. #8
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Or the Roman Saturnalia. Evergreens were used in festivals all throughout the north and then some. It usually meant rebirth of the sun(hence it being on the darkest days of the year) or something.
    Last edited by antisocialmunky; 04-08-2007 at 03:45.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  9. #9
    Sage of Bread Member Rilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EB Tavern, Professing my superiority.
    Posts
    932

    Default Re: question on dates b.c to ad

    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    ^ yup, 5000 BCE = ~ 7000 years ago
    don't forget that Christmas is actually a pagan Celtic holiday. :)

    Averni/Aedui with Christmas trees :)
    It might be but the whole name signifies a certain Monotheistic god's son... as such I refuse to celebrate the bloody holiday, if it was true Celtic Pagan holliday I would celebrate it with vigour as such I don't.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO