I've got two concerns at the moment, things that I definitely need advice on. I am currently playing an English Campaign on M/M.
1. Mongols - I think I'm pretty comfortable with dealing with them during sieges... it's a pain, but they're abundance of cavalry aren't really that much of an advantage if you can blunt their movement. I am however having a great deal of difficulty dealing with them in the field. It almost seems that without fail my forces get slaughtered.
I typically have the following forces.
3-5 longbows/yoemen archers
4 Levy spearmen
2-5 armoured swords/DEK
2-5 mortars/ribaults
the rest - GB, mailed knights, knights of St. John, English Knights
I usally try to take whatever high ground is available in the set up, deploy a solid line of stakes, and wait for the inevitable assault. I tend to run into problems as the Mongols set up within their own archers range, and coupled with tons of horse archers begin to pick me apart. Once my archers run out of ammo, I'm a sitting duck. If I stay put, I end up losing too many men, and am overrun by the horde of cavalry.
If I venture forth, I'm overrun by the horde of cavalry.
Thoughts? Is the issue my force composition? I don't seem to have any problems dealing with western forces, only the bloody Mongols.
2 - Bridges
I've had a few battles recently, where for strategic reasons I've had to take a bridge. What is the best way tactically to take a bridge, without having 3x or more numerical superiority? It's a long walk in the open across the bridge. Should I rush the defenders with cavalry, plow through, and simultaneously bring up my infantry? Then the cavalry can harass the defenders.
Thoughts? Advice? Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Gdek
Bookmarks