Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Any thoughts on "migration" campaigns?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Re: Any thoughts on "migration" campaigns?

    Quote Originally Posted by Morte66
    This recruitment system seems to be more historical (what happened) than realistic (what could quite fesibly have happened).

    A lot of the text in the mod talks about learning and adapting, e.g. Baktria being a mix of Hellenic/Persian/Indian units or the Romani units adopting equipment and techniques that worked against them. But it's like all change stopped on the last day of winter 273BC.

    Oh well, I still love it. And deciding what's realistic would be a nightmare.
    I agree with you, but I think the team shouldn't make fictional units. The Maks died in the 160's, so they don't get a reform except hysteroi pezhetairoi. The Romans were the "real-world-EB-winners", and so they get 3 reforms. The Saka get a reform with really odd greek units because they did in history, but the Sarmatians don't...

    I think it would be impossible and not desireable to make fantasy units of what might have been - though it would be great, of course. You would have to be God to make appropiate what-might-have-been units.
    Last edited by Centurio Nixalsverdrus; 04-11-2007 at 21:22.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO