Quote Originally Posted by doc_bean
I would be a lot easier to explain why we're invading Iran than it was to explain why we should have invaded Iraq with you guys. But not even the US has the balls to attack Iran, so this is a non-issue.

Regardless it would probably be a bad idea to attack them, China would probably want part of the 'action' which could be very bad in the long term. The muslim world 'might' unite and that would be a VERY bad thing, and in the short term oil prices will go though the roof, possibly crippling US economy.

Iran knows they've got us all by the nuts and there's little we can do about it.
Yet again Doc you dont dissapoint, you offer no solution or even an attempt at one, merely listing the potential negative outcomes to prior actions or future choices is pure armchair general and smacks of lack of imagination,and no real thought of your own.

instead we get
I would be a lot easier to explain why we're invading Iran than it was to explain why we should have invaded Iraq with you guys.
and
But not even the US has the balls to attack Iran
Come on, go out on a limb, put the "U.S. dosent have the balls" rhetoric to the side and lets hear what you think should be done about the Iranian nuclear issue.

Love to hear you give us an original thought on it Doc, rather then the tired recycled jib jabs you currently offer.

Of course coming from a position of
Iran knows they've got us all by the nuts and there's little we can do about it.
I suspect you dont really have a solution, or would even attempt to formulate one anyway.

ahhh makes it much easier to take the easy way out dosent it, I mean its easy to beat the same tired drum at nauseum after the fact.

Again, I find your contribution less then enlightening