Poll: Exploring the Opposition Mind on Iraq: whither to the future?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Exploring the Opposition Mind on Iraq: to the future

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Exploring the Opposition Mind on Iraq: to the future

    This issue hasn't got a lot(or none at all) of coverage
    I beg to differ , it gets a hell of a lot of coverage . And not much of it is of a bright agreeable future nature .

    may be kashmir, but it could also turn out to become like the separation of Norway and Sweden or, if noone are familiar with that, the separtion of ex-USSR provinces.
    Hmmmmmmmm....bad anology there ,Chechnya , Osettia , Dagestan , Georgia , Armenia , Azerbaijan ...... and to a lesser extent Belarus and Ukraine , not to mention the crazyness with Tajik Uzbek Turkmen and Kyrgyz regimes .

  2. #2
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Exploring the Opposition Mind on Iraq: to the future

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman
    I beg to differ , it gets a hell of a lot of coverage . And not much of it is of a bright agreeable future nature .


    Hmmmmmmmm....bad anology there ,Chechnya , Osettia , Dagestan , Georgia , Armenia , Azerbaijan ...... and to a lesser extent Belarus and Ukraine , not to mention the crazyness with Tajik Uzbek Turkmen and Kyrgyz regimes .
    I was thinking of the baltic states, ukraine and belarus when I wrote that. Sure, they've had some despotism and plenty of poverty, but none of them has seen a large armed conflict.

    Can't really see what your point is here though, are you disputing the claim that states can't separate into smaller states without conflict?

    BTW, I know fully well that the odds are against a relatively peaceful separation. That's not my point at all. My point, as the topic of this thread suggests, is that it is the best solution I can see to it. That means I rate it over withdrawing and leaving the iraqis to themselves and have the US troops there for another decade. It doesn't mean anything else, and I'm not saying that by doing things this way, all the people of the world sit in a circle and share hugs and kisses.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  3. #3
    Member Member Beren Son Of Barahi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    sydney, Australia
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: Exploring the Opposition Mind on Iraq: to the future

    The 3 state solution will only work if a fair and just way of handling the revenues can be found....now comes the tricky part, how does one work out what is fair and just?....by popluation? by land size? in 3 equal parts? let them make their own contracts aka FFA every man for themselves?... if a country like Australia cannot work out a fair way of divvying up the money from the GST (goods and services tax) then how can Iraq possibly work out a fair system for oil money?



    If they get it wrong, (and they most likley will...) it might look a little like this...


    The true test of a man is not at his great moment, but at his weakest point. -me

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO