Currently the choice is: items out of context or rubble.
Any argument that places oneself as one option is pointless. People value themselves far higher than most things.
![]()
Currently the choice is: items out of context or rubble.
Any argument that places oneself as one option is pointless. People value themselves far higher than most things.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Looting is part of the spoils of every war. This war is no different. With all the facade of civillisation and ethical ideology, the warring factions are no different than any other in history.
Something should be done about it, but I'm sure with Iraq Total Chaos going on the coalition has got their hands full. So there is a valid excuse !!! (joke)
If you remember me from M:TW days add me on Steam, do mention your org name.
http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/__shak
And maybe they're right.Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
If the world allows the argument: "I am an educated and respected archeologist from Europe, so I will take these objects so that they don't get broken."
How is that different from: "I am an educated and respected oilman from Texas, so I will take this oil so that it isn't wasted." ?
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
I guess because the esteemed Texan is unlikely to conserve the removed oil in an accessible museum, researched and available to all visitors for generations to come and with the possibility of repatriating the oil when the donor country settles down.*Originally Posted by KukriKhan
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
"If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
Albert Camus "Noces"
Point taken. But what is indisputeable is that the resource(s) "under the soil" belong to the inhabitants, and they ought not be taken, whether for the alleged good of mankind overall, or the enrichment of the taker, without the inhabitants' consent.
As Sinan points out above, a conqueror may be able to lay claim to war-booty - but are we conquerors?
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
So better destroyed by the locals than taken and looked after elsewhere?![]()
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
A lot of stuff is being destroyed by the guys that take it away. Not really much different than excavating Egyptian tombs with dynamite, then selling off any surviving loot.Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
If you're fighting fair you've made a miscalculation.
Well bugger me sideways and call me shirley , The Gibbon has a point , a rather relevant point , in fact it might be described as the most relevant point that a relevant pointy person (on a particularly good pointy day) could possiblly come up with .In Archaeological excavations the method of extraction is key.
Bookmarks