I don't take it as rude. As for being selective I would have to disagree with you as I have tried to find differing views from the authors I have read. Allot of the authors I quote from came from Pyscho V. Tendentious would apply to all here, not just I. As far as: "such as the mistake of assuming strategic success necessitated superior troop calibre..."Originally Posted by Watchman
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=312Originally Posted by Frostwulf
I agree with you on this, though at the beginning I think the majority would have been Germanic.Originally Posted by Erebus26
I believe this is born out in the ancient writers. The Germani from what I read always said they were Suebi,Chatti,Batavi or whatever. The only exception to this is when they were in Roman service where they may refer to themselves as Germani. As far as the Celts are concerned I'm not sure. They did use the term Germani when describing the Suebi(according to Caesar) so they may have linked those who spoke German to all be Germani.Originally Posted by Erebus26
There may have been minor variances but for the most part I agree with you that they would have been very similar.Originally Posted by Erebus26
Bookmarks