Sorry for making this topic 'up in the front line again' -
But, are there any special motive for using one very powerfull attribute in EB only for 'some' units?
To be more specific

Why is COMMAND attribute used in 'export_descr_unit.txt' refering only to Celts - let me note: Casse - Britania?

Like;

Cidainh (celtic chariot cidainh bodyguards, celtic chariot cidainh), = britons, slave

Calawre (celtic infantry calawre), = britons, slave

Carnute Cingetos (celtic infantry carnute cingetos), = gauls, slave

Cwmyr (celtic infantry cwmyr), = gauls, britons, scythia, slave

Kluddargos (celtic infantry kluddargos) = britons, slave, gauls, scythia

Rycalawre (celtic infantry rycalawre) = britons, slave

Drwdae (celtic infantry drwdae) = gauls, scythia, britons, slave

Lugian Swordsmen (celtic infantry lugian) = britons, slave, gauls, scythia, germans, dacia

Is this a bug or a command issue?? How did EB team reached a point to OK this? Because all EB members are calling and quoting and explaining that everything is 'history-based' - now this?
Realy, I was just trying to add HP 2 for general_unit to see how it would work with EB 1 - and I found that no Legion has this? Am I wrong? If I am - then sorry..
I would not like to belive that someone is actually 'giving' some nice attributes to 'some' units just because they are - Casse or Celtic? No?

Well if not, I would realy like to know why are those units above so speciall..

Thank you!