Finally the last part to this thread, the Celtic units.

For the Gaesatae:
Its been said the Gaesatae used drugs and were really tough, but to me what counts is performance in battles. I was watching the history channel when they interviewed a US tank commander from WW2. He said prior to going to going overseas the US army told them that the Sherman was as good if not better then the German tanks. The US tank commander said that when he got into battle it was obvious what the US army told them was untrue.

The situation is the same with the Gaesatae, you can say all you want about them on drugs(magic potions), being bodyguards to Hannibal and etc.(I doubt all of it, this is probably from the same source as the "Devastating Civil Wars") but what really counts is how they performed in battle. As shown in the battles of Telemon,Clusium/Faesulae and Clastidium I don't see any reason why the Gaesatae deserve the stats they have.
For those that say the Gaesatae of Telemon are not the same as those of Clusium/Faesulae and Clastidium:

Ross Cowan-“For the Glory of Rome”-“During the Cimbric War the primus pilus Gnaeus Petreius, tired of his tribune’s reluctance to attack the German force which had surrounded the legion, gutted the cowardly officer with his gladius and let the legion out to victory.” pg.238

Ross Cowan-“For the Glory of Rome”-“In 222BC Roman attention turned to the Insubres. Then new consuls, Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio and Marcus Claudius Marcellus, rejected peace proposals offered by the Insubres and assaulted their stronghold at Acerrae. In anticipation of this, Insubres had enlisted the services of 30,000 Gaesati mercenaries, and attacked the Roman supply base at Clastidium. The consuls had to divied their forces, Marcellus rushing to Clastidium with two-thirds of the cavalry (3000-3500?) And only 600 light infantry, while Scipio pressed on with the siege of Acerrae.”pg.155

Ross Cowan-“For the Glory of Rome”-“Marcellus covered the distance to Clastidium in record time but his tired force appears to have been suprised by the Gauls just ouside the town. The Gauls, Gaesati numbering 10,000, were commanded by their king, Viridomarus, a typically towering and muscular figure.”pg.157
Also this:
Connolly-"Greece and Rome at War"-"The next year 30,000 Gaesati (the ones who fought naked) crossed the Alps to assist their kinsmen in the Po valley. The Romans laid siege to the Insubrian town of Acerrae, north of the Po. In an attempt to draw off the legions the Celts attacked the Roman supply depot at Casteggio, 50km west of piacenza." pg.146
Ellis says the same thing, the Gaesatae of Telemon are the same as those of Clusium/Faesulae and Clastidium.
I don't know if this is the case but if it is:
Guido Achille Mansuelli-"The Celts"*-"Though it is tempting to compare the fianna bands of Irish warriors with the Gesati who fought at the Battle of the Telamon, we would be in danger of moving into very unsure ground historically.pg.17
Of the Soldurii:
Caesar-"The Gallic War"-"Their request was granted and they proceeded to hand their weapons over as ordered. But while the attention of all our men was focused on this transaction, their commander-in-chief Adiatumnus went into action in another part of the town with 600 followers whom they called soldurii. The rule of this order is that they share in the enjoyment of all life's advantages with the friends to whom they have committed themselves, and if the friend succumbs to any violence they either share his fate or commit suicide; there is no record of one who refused to die when the man to whose friendship he had committed himself was killed. It was with such followers that Adiatumnus attempted his sortie, but a shout was raised in that part of the fortification. The soldiers ran to arms, and after a sharp engagement Adiatumnus was driven back into the town. But he petitioned Crassus for the old terms of surrender and obtained his desire. Book 3,22
Again here there is nothing to show that they deserve the stats they have. I did some tests on some units using grassy flat lands and medium difficulty. At the beginning I just clicked on my units and then clicked attack on the enemy soldiers and the computer did the rest, I didn't interfere.
2units of praetorian(205 soldiers) vs. 3 units of soldurii(184 warriors):

I control the praetorians=3 losses.
I control the soldurii= I won 3 and lost 2.

2units of praetorian(205 soldiers) vs. 3 units of Rycalawre(184 warriors):
I control the praetorians=3 losses and 1 win.
I control the Rycalawre= 1 win and 3 losses.

I did the same with the hammer guys with one win, one loss.

The problems with doing this is the computer controlled units will do some odd things. I think Neo-Spartans way is the best and that is to have two people square off against each other with the same amount of troops.

I do have a problem with lower level Celtic elites losing to the praetorians! Where does that leave the Carnutes,Orca,Uachtarch(or whatever they are called now) etc?
I don't have a problem at all with the stats of the Remi Mairepos, though I did find it funny that the Remi were first mentioned by Caesar.

So for simplicity, even if you do believe in the "Devastating Civil War" you still have Romans militia/conscript troops defeating larger Celtic armies. So if you have these militia/conscript troops defeating the Celts, how is it that they are better then the later professional Roman troops? It makes no sense what so ever.
The Celtic elite units are overpowered.