Thanks, BG!

This is understood so well and to such an extent that now self-censorship has become a problem. Under Muslim intimidation - real or imagined - movies and plays are not shown and books and articles remain unpublished.
That is important. Freedom of speech needs to be cherished. Giving it up to be kind to some group is as bad as having it taken by that group.

I think the urge of Muslim leaders in the West to control their 'own' communities is demonstrated most clearly by their demand to be allowed to apply sharia law in their 'constituencies'. Canada seems to have had some experience with his, in the sense that these sharia courts are used to suppress mostly immigrant women who don't speak the language of the host country, who don't know their rights, etcetera. Such courts operate in secret, no records are kept, and verdicts are reached by judges who have difficulty counting to ten and writing their own names. Not a huge success, I believe.

Swedish Muslim leaders have demanded the same sort of sharia juridisdiction, but were treated to a loud and clear 'No' from the government.
That's interesting (and disturbing). Do you have any sources on that? To me, it seems like stopping the spread of Sharia law and insuring immigrants integrate into the justice system is an essential factor.

CR