I would, as soon as somebody explains to me why this nuance is implicitly understood when, say, the Guardian writes 'Freedom of press at peril in Russia' but not when somebody writes '...at peril by Islamicism'.
There is nothing wrong when someone writes that , but too often it is written as Islam not islamicism .
Take the title of this topicCanadian Journalist Attacked by Muslims Canadian journalist attacked by fundamentalist Islamic fruitcakes reads very differently , offensive maybe but specificly offensive .
And it fits better with Ser Clegs line.......
the reasoning behind any act of such deserves to be mentioned