Results 1 to 30 of 179

Thread: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    I have not really tried to use pikeman in campaign and today i just test them out with custom battle on some S&S units.

    I was so surprise even head to head, with a stationary defensive solid setup, the pikeman are chopped into pieces by those S&S unit.

    I even tried 2 units of pikemen vs 1 unit of dismounted feudal knight (so they cant "wrap" up my flank), the DFK still outrun them all even at the front of pikeline?? (150 pikemen gone, only 20 DFK is killed....)

    I am not sure if this is right any infantry can beat an organised solid pikeline head to head so easily??

  2. #2

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Not surprising, The pikemen have a penalty to attack VS infantry, they have less attack to begin with, and usually less armour.
    A general rule is only use pikemen as infantry if they are upper tier and have maxed out armour upgrades.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by Moral55
    Not surprising, The pikemen have a penalty to attack VS infantry, they have less attack to begin with, and usually less armour.
    A general rule is only use pikemen as infantry if they are upper tier and have maxed out armour upgrades.
    Oh, i never know such penalty applied for pikeman, if thats the case in m2tw only? [RTW pikeman works different]

    And such penalty make little sense to me in real life situation, other then game play balancing concern.

    The most weird thing in m2tw is, in the initial contact, even the swordman didnt touch the pikeman in the animation, their charge still kill all the front rank of the pikeman....

  4. #4

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    pikemen are bugged intentionally but there are ways to get around CAs little tricks.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by mad cat mech
    pikemen are bugged intentionally but there are ways to get around CAs little tricks.
    "bugged" intentionally? It can either be bugged or intended i think?

    Sorry if i have missed this bug which might have been discuss before 1.02. (all the major bugs i know is shield and 2h bug)

  6. #6
    Guest Gaius Terentius Varro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Spamming Thunder Braves
    Posts
    349

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    They changed it to stop scottish pike spam in MP

  7. #7
    Unpatched Member hrvojej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    It depends...
    Posts
    2,070

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius Terentius Varro
    They changed it to stop scottish pike spam in MP


    They went on the record with this? Cause if they did, and this is in fact the case, I am thoroughly

    Now, if all this is true, please tell me there is a better way to go around this than removing the pikemen's secondary weapons altogether.
    Some people get by with a little understanding
    Some people get by with a whole lot more - A. Eldritch

  8. #8

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    the professional late-medieval swiss pikemen were regarded as pretty much unbeatable as long as they held rank, and should be so in the game too.

    sword and buckler men would bypass the pike points by rolling under the pikes and entering meelee, but they cant possibly have have suceeded with that tactic on a regular basis, just imagine how hard that move would be to pull of.

    therefore, the good pike units should in most cases beat swordsmen front to front. lesser pike militia, with lower cohesion, might be an other matter because they loose formation quicker and allow swordmen to infiltrate the ranks.

    game balance is all well and good, but historically, for a while pike reigned the battlefield almost supreme, and should do so in the game too, losing their dominant position first when field arty and gunners are introduced.

  9. #9
    Man behind the screen Member Empirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Heidelberg, Germany
    Posts
    246

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    I'd like to see the more professional soldiers performing better because of discipline issues, not stats alone. This is especially important for pike units that rely on unit cohesion a lot. If you bring only pike militia, seeing them switch to swords in melee or being broken up by swordsmen feels realistic. But if you bring higher-tech pikes (Tercio, Aventuros, Scotch what-was-their-names), these should really be impregnable from the front, just because they hold formation better and don't let go of their pikes in a hurry. This system of "performs better because of discipline" could also be tied to unit experience, to make the system more interesting. This is really something I'd like to see! Until then, Carl's ProblemFixer removes a pike unit's swords, which is sufficient to make it worthwhile.
    People know what they do,
    And they know why they do what they do,
    But they do not know what what they are doing does
    -Catherine Bell

  10. #10

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    @ Carl

    I think i am going to fix the pike issue on my 1.02 game, could you let me know what have you done to fix the pike problem in your fixer mod? If the only thing i have to do is removing the secondary weapon [sword] ? thanks a lot!

    I guess without a fixer, even with the full release of 1.2, pike unit which cant even hold their own at front is totally useless imo.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Making pikemen nearly invincible against frontal melee attackers makes both S&S infantry and heavy cavalry far less useful. Granted, pikemen are currently of limited use themselves, but they are the only unit type capable of withstanding a cavalry charge and killing cavalry quickly with minimal losses as well as directly protecting another unit from that charge.

    However, I'd agree that they whip out their swords too soon against attacking infantry, and inflict too few casualties . Making them use their pikes longer and inflicting greater casualties on infantry is perfectly fine, but they should still lose a 1 vs. 1 match against a comparable S&S unit.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    the only reason sword and buckler men succeeded against pikes is because they were integrated in the tercio pikemens ranks. when the pike walls engaged the sword and buckler men would crawl underneath the melee and start hamstringing the opponents pikemen.

    this would be very difficult to implement in the game. also a disciplined pike formation would tend to remain holding their pikes despite if an isolated individual makes it throught the pike wall because they know that if they continue to inflict damage to the rest of his unit he will look back and realize he is isolated while his unit is fleeing.

    furthermore under the weighted advance of a swiss pike block he would also stand a good chance of loosing his balance and being trampled underfoot.

    offensive pike tactics also usually integrated a core of halberdiers inside the pike block to continue the attack in case the spear wall broke down.

    a very formidable combination, but also very difficult to emulate in the game because of different marching speeds.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by Miracle
    Making pikemen nearly invincible against frontal melee attackers makes both S&S infantry and heavy cavalry far less useful. Granted, pikemen are currently of limited use themselves, but they are the only unit type capable of withstanding a cavalry charge and killing cavalry quickly with minimal losses as well as directly protecting another unit from that charge.
    That's just not true. In RTW, phalanxes were tough from the front against anything, however, they were far from invulnerable.

  14. #14
    Ricardus Insanusaum Member Bob the Insane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Smith
    That's just not true. In RTW, phalanxes were tough from the front against anything, however, they were far from invulnerable.
    Quite true, and a head-on battle between a decent phalanx and a good S&S (or spear) unit often ended up with very few initial casuaulties as the S&S could defend themseves against the pikes but could not get close enough attack the men. Only if the S&S men could get around the flanks or somehow break the formation and get in could they do a lot of damage. Until then there was just a lot of pushing....

  15. #15
    King Philippe of France Senior Member _Tristan_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Reigning over France
    Posts
    3,264

    Default Re: Pikeman vs Sword & Shield head to head post 1.02?

    Quote Originally Posted by RickooClan
    I was so surprise even head to head, with a stationary defensive solid setup, the pikeman are chopped into pieces by those S&S unit.
    You shouldn't have been surprise...

    Historically, and from what I remember from my tabletop wargaming days, S&S units were the perfect antithesis of pikes... Think of how more free of movement a sworsman is compared to a man wielding a 10-foot long pike which could be easily diverted to get to the man behind...
    King Baldwin the Tyrant, King of Jerusalem, Warden of the Holy Sepulchre, Slayer of Sultans in the Crusades Hotseat (new write-up here and previous write-up here)
    Methodios Tagaris, Caesar and Rebelin LotR
    Mexica Sunrise : An Aztec AAR



    Philippe 1er de France
    in King of the Franks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO