Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: Anyone Else Hate Assaulting Settlements?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Man-at-Arms Member Dave1984's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Staffordshire
    Posts
    255

    Default Re: Anyone Else Hate Assaulting Settlements?

    I don't autoresolve my siege assault battles but I don't "assault", either, I siege until the enemy sallies or surrenders. It's one of them, or nothing, as the assualts are so dull and every single one is almost the same- there's no grand sweeping movements, no manouever, no room for strategy beyond "make another hole behind them". And there are way too many of them, that's why I still play with the big map mod, simply so I can play open field battles more often.

  2. #2
    Guest Gaius Terentius Varro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Spamming Thunder Braves
    Posts
    349

    Default Re: Anyone Else Hate Assaulting Settlements?

    I get brilliant tactical monents in sieges. Try assaulting one with catapults positioned in city square: you'll see your elites running like little girls...Besides in real life if the opposing general knew you sucked at siege warfare then guess he would choose to fight
    Last edited by Gaius Terentius Varro; 04-26-2007 at 18:02.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO