Kung Fu Mafia [Concluded]

[Sigurd]

eh BK is leading te tally

I need to create a spreadsheet... with the people shifting votes all the time.. someone will screw up the tally.

ByzantineKnight is leading... is he our candidate?

[sapi]

Unvote

I'm going to sleep, and I don't want my vote to lynch an innocent while I sleep.

The challenge stands, though

[Andres]

Well, BK, you must admit you are talking much more than usual. Your regular style is lurking throughout the whole game, so what's up? Why the change in style?

And where's Ichigo? He's usually the one with the most posts in mafia games...?

Oh, and since we are using another voting system, maybe you should all hold in mind that one or two votes won't pressure anybody to talk. You'll need at least (The required number of votes to lynch) - 2 to put some real pressure on a player.

Voting for somebody because he is "bandwagoning" is not a good reason in this system. As Sigurd pointed out, a bandwagon is neccessary to obtain a lynching, so you can't put suspicion on a player because he tries helping the town in getting a suspect lynched.

So, to put some real pressure:

Unvote; Vote : ByzantineKnight

Mostly because of the sudden change of style compared to previous games. A decent explanation please.


Andres: 1 (BK)
ByzantineKnight : 4 (Tran, Redleg, Stig, Andres)
greaterkhaan : 1 (BlackAxe)
Stig : 1 (CA)
TwilightBlade: 1 (pevergreen)
Xehh: 1 (Xdeathfire)
No lynch: 1 (HughTower)
Vote:Abstain (TS)

[Stig]

And where's Ichigo?

He couldn't vote Sasaki so he's on strike

As Sigurd pointed out, a bandwagon is neccessary to obtain a lynching.

Wrong, bandwagoning is voting without a reason
If enough of us are convinced of his quilt no-one is bandwagoning.

[Andres]

Wrong, bandwagoning is voting without a reason
If enough of us are convinced of his quilt no-one is bandwagoning.

You're right. But it seems like some players call putting a third or fourth vote on somebody, even with an explanation, "bandwagoning".

[Stig]

In that case they are wrong


shall we lynch them?

[Tran]

Cheap tactic you know, to divert attention and/or suspicion away.

[HughTower]

Wrong, bandwagoning is voting without a reason
If enough of us are convinced of his quilt no-one is bandwagoning.

You're right. But it seems like some players call putting a third or fourth vote on somebody, even with an explanation, "bandwagoning".

Erm, actually, he's wrong.

To 'bandwagon' is to join a growing campaign against one person for no good reason apart from the fact that there is already a campaign against them.

If we all just voted without any argument or explanation, the Mafia could more easily use it as an opportunity to hide & to get a free kill. So, to avoid being accused of 'bandwagonning', you should try & give your reasons for why someone should be lynched.

Voting for somebody because he is "bandwagoning" is not a good reason in this system. As Sigurd pointed out, a bandwagon is neccessary to obtain a lynching, so you can't put suspicion on a player because he tries helping the town in getting a suspect lynched.

This is wrong too. 'Bandwagoning', as explained above, is voting in a suspicious or unhelpful manner; a well-considered majority verdict is necessary for a lynching - there's a key difference between the two.

It's alright to think somebody's argument is good - you just need to explain why you think it's good.

As BK - noise at the beginning of the game is just noise. I don't think he's our man.

[Andres]

To 'bandwagon' is to join a growing campaign against one person for no good reason apart from the fact that there is already a campaign against them.

So, to avoid being accused of 'bandwagonning', you should try & give your reasons for why someone should be lynched.

@BK: you have to compare my posting habits to Cosa Nuova II which is my new standard. I don't want another humiliation of a total mafia victory like we saw in Ichigo's game...

EDIT: deleted text for minimalistic smiley

[ChuggtheSquirrel]

sry

[Andres]

sry

Why are you apologizing?

[ChuggtheSquirrel]

Why are you apologizing?

I made a bad post... Sorry

[seireikhaan]

Vote: ByzantineKnight. Please explain the whole shop deal.

[ByzantineKnight]

Well, BK, you must admit you are talking much more than usual. Your regular style is lurking throughout the whole game, so what's up? Why the change in style?

Mostly because of the sudden change of style compared to previous games. A decent explanation please.

Whenever I am in more than one mafia games at the same time such as Three Sons of Algamar, Monks and Masons 2, and Texas Mafia (not sure this is at the same time), I am very active in one, and, yes, I lurk in the others. I happen to post alot in this one, because I love the concept (Thanks Sasaki!!)

@Everyone who said that Andres post alot: I know that, I was pointing out that he is posting more than normal...

@Tran: I was really trying to make a joke, i thought only mafia could use the weapons...

ByzantineKnight

PS: I have to get off the computer for the day, I will be back tomorrow (mabye), so I can't Reply

[Tran]

@Tran: I was really trying to make a joke, i thought only mafia could use the weapons...

Did you mean Omanes? I asked nothing, only random vote...

[Stig]

I was really trying to make a joke, i thought only mafia could use the weapons...

You were not talking as if you were joking

PS: I have to get off the computer for the day, I will be back tomorrow (mabye), so I can't Reply

cheap