Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 37

Thread: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

  1. #1
    Guest Dayve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    I know it's historical that they fought overhand and whatnot, but since the phalanx formation has been removes, Greek hoplites take huge damage against archers, slingers and ESPECIALLY javelineers...

    I just started my first campaign with a hoplite using faction, the Greeks, and i notice that my hoplites get torn up by the above mentioned missle units... Even Spartan hoplites!

    Now, this may be historically accurate, as i understand large numbers of skirmishers became the order of the day in the later years due to the casualties they could inflict, but this is putting the Greeks at an unfair disadvantage against phalangites, which CAN form a phalanx.

    Phalanx formation reduces missle damage so much that whole units of skirmishers can loose 10 volleys into them and not kill even 1 man, despite the phalangites being more lightly armoured and having smaller shields than hoplites...

    A full unit of 160 Greek classical hoplites will get butchered by a unit of akontistai... If all volleys are thrown, the hoplites will take over 1/4 losses, sometimes more, even Spartans... Whereas a mediocre unit of phalangites, if all volleys are thrown, will take around 1/20 damage, if that... The better phalangites don't take any damage at all frontally from skirmishers, or if they do it's just one or two men.

    Is there no way to make the phalangites weaker to missles while still retaining their current defence valued in hand to hand?

  2. #2
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    I wuv my hoplites and think that they are great units. I do agree that missiles can do alot of damage against them, but they are well balanced, all around good units. The thing that you have to keep in mind is that they shouldn't be compared to phalanxes like that. Just because the phalanx gets the additional frontal missile bonus doesn't put the greeks to a disadvantage, Just look at all the advantages of the phalanx, slow, bad when the formation loses cohesion, and nearly no missile defense from behind or to the sides.

    I'd just include more skirmishers and outrunner hoplites to soak up damage and slingers to take out their slingers.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  3. #3

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Greek hoplites are one of the best units in the game in terms of overall usefulness and cost-effectiveness for what they offer, if not the best unit on these terms.

    Hoplites have a great defense, excelent morale, being able to sap, bonus against cavalry, and a good charge bonus (6). It costs 343 of upkeep per 1 unit of 160 men. The Galatian Heavy Spearman, for eg, a unit comparable to the hoplite greek statwise, needs +600 to upkeep.

    They are a fine addition to any army, and I cannot simply see their "unfair disadvantage".

  4. #4
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayve
    A full unit of 160 Greek classical hoplites will get butchered by a unit of akontistai... If all volleys are thrown, the hoplites will take over 1/4 losses, sometimes more, even Spartans... Whereas a mediocre unit of phalangites, if all volleys are thrown, will take around 1/20 damage, if that... The better phalangites don't take any damage at all frontally from skirmishers, or if they do it's just one or two men.

    Is there no way to make the phalangites weaker to missles while still retaining their current defence valued in hand to hand?
    The bolded part is almost certainly an exaggeration. I've seen Akontisai cause some nasty casualties against armoured troops but that's a rare, random occurrence.

    I agree that phalangites are a little to durable, most probably due to their high shield bonuses. Shield points are more effective against missiles then armour points, especially slingers. These shields would be pretty durable (I understand they're partly bronze, just like argive shields) but they're fairly small and only protect the torso.

    Try editing the EDU and give phalangites -1 on the shield bonuses and hoplites +1, you'll see a noticable difference in missile casualties. If you want you can compensate this loss/gain with the armour or defense skill values.

  5. #5
    Member Member soibean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    640

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    the only time Ive seen casualties like that is if the missile units attack from the flank when the phalanx is engaged

  6. #6
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    personally, I think the phalangite pikemen are way over-armored.
    They're suppose to be lightly armored soldiers with small shields...yet I can fire hundreds of rounds of arrows into them and only kill 3-4 soldiers.

    I agree that the phalanx formation in .81/.81a version gives the phalangites a ridiculously high level of protection against missile weapons. I mean, how the hell are levy phalangites surviving cretan archer barages while my classical hoplites are getting torn to shreds?
    Last edited by Intranetusa; 04-27-2007 at 20:08.
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  7. #7
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    The pikes had a habit of entangling projectiles, I understand. Imagine trying to fire an arrow through several successive fences and you should get the idea.

    As for the Classicals, didn't they once adopt the technique of running the last hundred meters or so just to clear the "kill zone" of Persian archers ASAP ? And that was not during the Peloponnesian War period of leaving body armour off...
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  8. #8
    Member Member mAIOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Maia - Portugal
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    That's right. I have to counter the fact that phalangites wore little armor. they would be regularly equiped with a linen/leather cuirass and the shield was enough. Later, in medieval Europe, several people managed to achieve great results with pike formations without shields. the reformed phalanx of the Macedonians had chain mail to protect themselves thus gaining much more endurance than their predecessors. All in all, I don't think hoplites have such a disadvantage as I've never seen the casualties you've faced (not saying it can't happen but I guess the odds are pretty low).


    Cheers...

  9. #9
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    ^ if a metal arrowhead struck the wooden pike, wooden that splinter or shatter the pike? Pikes being able to stop/entagle arrows would also mean pikes getting damaged/destroyed
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  10. #10
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    ^ if a metal arrowhead struck the wooden pike, wooden that splinter or shatter the pike? Pikes being able to stop/entagle arrows would also mean pikes getting damaged/destroyed
    The fun thing about wood is its ability bend/twist/absorb and diffuse force unlike stone. If an arrow hit a pike, the pike would bend and maybe the arrow would get lodged but it wouldn't snap. I would think that things used to stop horsemen and resist annoying little men trying to hack the tips off could survive a arrow.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  11. #11

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayve
    I know it's historical that they fought overhand and whatnot, but since the phalanx formation has been removes, Greek hoplites take huge damage against archers, slingers and ESPECIALLY javelineers...

    I just started my first campaign with a hoplite using faction, the Greeks, and i notice that my hoplites get torn up by the above mentioned missle units... Even Spartan hoplites!

    Now, this may be historically accurate, as i understand large numbers of skirmishers became the order of the day in the later years due to the casualties they could inflict, but this is putting the Greeks at an unfair disadvantage against phalangites, which CAN form a phalanx.

    Phalanx formation reduces missle damage so much that whole units of skirmishers can loose 10 volleys into them and not kill even 1 man, despite the phalangites being more lightly armoured and having smaller shields than hoplites...

    A full unit of 160 Greek classical hoplites will get butchered by a unit of akontistai... If all volleys are thrown, the hoplites will take over 1/4 losses, sometimes more, even Spartans... Whereas a mediocre unit of phalangites, if all volleys are thrown, will take around 1/20 damage, if that... The better phalangites don't take any damage at all frontally from skirmishers, or if they do it's just one or two men.

    Is there no way to make the phalangites weaker to missles while still retaining their current defence valued in hand to hand?
    I'v personally never seen that, most troops with hoplite level armour/shield or more take like zero missile damage unless I have like 4-5 slingers on them. But to be fair, it could happen, ask the spartans at the Battle of Lechaeum.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  12. #12
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky
    The fun thing about wood is its ability bend/twist/absorb and diffuse force unlike stone. If an arrow hit a pike, the pike would bend and maybe the arrow would get lodged but it wouldn't snap. I would think that things used to stop horsemen and resist annoying little men trying to hack the tips off could survive a arrow.
    Plus the pike-shafts are thin, round, and at most inconvenient angles for achieving the kind of square hit that would allow most projectiles to do much beyond bounce off and leave a scrape. And a projectile trying to play flipper ball amongst serried ranks of pikes is pretty obviously going to run out of energy but fast, and certainly won't be the most dangerous object around for the pikemen.

    As for Lechaeum, wasn't that during the period when hoplite armour was pretty much restricted to helmets for improved tactical mobility ? I've gotten the impression body armour for the heavy infantry only again became common some decades later, probably because the hoplites had started feeling really vulnerable to all these darn skirmishers, slingers and archers now running all around the place...
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  13. #13
    Member Member mAIOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Maia - Portugal
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Actually I believe it was in the Tracian wars they ditched the armor so they could catch those darn peltast slingers and whatnot. But as the time flew by, they realised that in heavy infantry combat (like against persians and such) it was their armor that gave them so much staying power against other weapons (thermopilae) so they readopted it leaving only some squadrons lightly armored to serve as fast infantry.


    Cheers...

  14. #14
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    I wonder about that. I seem to recall reading the first ones to drop armour on a large scale were the Spartans (who AFAIK didn't have too much contact with the Itchy Dwar- pesky Thracians), in the interests of tactical nimbleness of formation, a couple of decades before the Peloponnesian War broke out - and the hoplites still mainly fought each other in that one too, what now the cavalry and light infantry arms were making themselves increasingly (and, particularly in the case of the horsies, often bloodily) felt. So I rather doubt if they regarded the armour as such a primary consideration for heavy-infantry clashes all things considered.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  15. #15
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Well armour was being dropped from the eighth century onwards. Vambraces and thigh,/bicep protection was pretty much gone by the Persian Wars and by the start of the Peloponesian Wars Linthorax had mostly replaced bronze. As always this had a lot to do with cost, and lowering the requirements so you could have more Hoplites.

    Armour really reached a low ebb during the Peloponesian War though, the Spartans basically got down to a wool cap. The Peloponesian War basically bankrupted everyone and losing armour is a good way to reduce the cost of your soldiers.

    There's also the problem that if you get killed someone tends to take grandad's armour off your corpse.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  16. #16
    Member Member mAIOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Maia - Portugal
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    I have to recheck my sources on that. But, it's geting late and I need to sleep as tomorow I've got to study hard so probably after monday I can give you some input.


    Cheers...

  17. #17
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Well, whatever the specific motivation the relevant practical side effect is pretty obvious - Arrows Hurt.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  18. #18
    Handler of candles Member Xehh II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Super Magical Greatness Land
    Posts
    1,367

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
    Linthorax had mostly replaced bronze.
    What is Linthorax?
    A ha ha! Rainbows and unicorns! Rainbows and unicorns!

  19. #19

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    ^ if a metal arrowhead struck the wooden pike, wooden that splinter or shatter the pike? Pikes being able to stop/entagle arrows would also mean pikes getting damaged/destroyed
    If a pike shaft broke just from an arrow hitting it, how would it be expected to stand up to the force of sticking into a charging horse??

  20. #20
    Member Member Cataclysm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    California, home of the Governator
    Posts
    30

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan_Grr
    Greek hoplites are one of the best units in the game in terms of overall usefulness and cost-effectiveness for what they offer, if not the best unit on these terms.

    Hoplites have a great defense, excelent morale, being able to sap, bonus against cavalry, and a good charge bonus (6). It costs 343 of upkeep per 1 unit of 160 men. The Galatian Heavy Spearman, for eg, a unit comparable to the hoplite greek statwise, needs +600 to upkeep.

    They are a fine addition to any army, and I cannot simply see their "unfair disadvantage".

    I agree with Dan on this one. At first, in my current Mak campaign I didn't bother recruiting them since the Macedonian phalanx is, of course, the preferred core of their forces.

    But on a whim I substituted them for Theuroporoi and used them to anchor the flank of my pike line. Usually setting them on guard mode. They did a great job securing the flank and their performance was on par with the theuroporoi.

    I've found they are also capable troops when assaulting/defending stone walls. As a result, I now include them in almost all of my armies.

  21. #21
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Quote Originally Posted by Xehh II
    What is Linthorax?
    Teh Wiki is often decent for basic data.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  22. #22
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    ^ besides, I dont think the thin spears can really stop much arrows...
    Phalangites have way to much frontal defense/armor/shield and are way to resistant against arrows.
    >_<
    Last edited by Intranetusa; 04-28-2007 at 02:32.
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  23. #23

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    The sarissa was not exactly thin. Realistically they would take pretty serious casualties from the rear but you can't have everything. The sarissa was so big it wiggled as you carried it, so that made it significantly more unlikely that an arrow would get through- it was mostly flexible woods like birch where available (let's avoid a wood debate please), so the arrows sort of glanced if they hit directly and were knocked off course (significantly reducing their velocity) if swept from the side as the spears flexed. One in four/six probably got through, but there's no guarantee then that those arrows would hit or be fatal, they had shields and leather is a better guard than one might expect. Even still one barely has to look at the armor donated to temples in Greece after battles to understand why arrows were always a big concern for hoplites (quite the bold statement that one about fighting in the shade eh?).
    Hegemonia Lead Modeller.

  24. #24
    Member Member hoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    The country that replaced Zelix
    Posts
    1,937

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    What is Linthorax?
    A typo...

    Anyway, I agree with general tone of the thread, Classical Hoplites are while not spectacular, solid general purpose heavy infantry.
    maybe those guys should be doing something more useful...

  25. #25
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Personaly I reduce phalignites frontal resistance to missils by taking down their shield bonuses and uppin their defense skill to compensate and keep them vulerable to the flanks and rear.
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  26. #26
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    it's still strange to picture spears blocking arrows... :/
    Last edited by Intranetusa; 04-28-2007 at 16:21.
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  27. #27
    Now sporting a classic avatar! Member fallen851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    799

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenring
    Shield points are more effective against missiles then armour points, especially slingers.
    This is entirely wrong. It is the opposite. Shield points 7/8th effective as armour points vs missiles.
    "It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s

  28. #28
    Member Member Afro Thunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    1123, 6536, 5321
    Posts
    219

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalan

    That's odd. I figured that since slingers are "Effective Against Armour", armor points would be less effective than shield points.
    Proud Strategos of the

  29. #29
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    Quote Originally Posted by Intranetusa
    it's still strange to picture spears blocking arrows... :/
    For a quick-and-dirty way to test the basic principle, find a tree with lots of branches. Try to throw a meter-long stick through them a couple of times.

    The concept of "entanglement" should be rather concrete after this.
    Last edited by Watchman; 04-28-2007 at 17:48.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  30. #30
    EB Beta Tester & Sex Slave Member Brightblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: Hoplites have been put at an unfair disadvantage because they can't form a phalanx...

    My neighbor would probably think I'm insane, and his daughter will stop oogling me if I did this!

    lols


    We ask ourselves whether our names will echo through the ages... how bravely we fought, how fiercely we loved.

    Currently: Slave in EB's beta testing dungeons!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO