Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Victory validates decisions

  1. #1
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Victory validates decisions

    We haven't had a good Israeli thread for oh, several days, and with the impending publication of the interim Winograd Report, I suspect we shall soon be overwhelmed with Levantine fun.

    As a supporting feature before the main event however, I was intrigued by this opinion piece by Shmuel Rosner. PM Olmert looks pretty doomed, and the Winograd leaks appear to demonstrate a capability for authority and command that deserves that fate.

    But Rosner glances at the issue of the Lebanon war with one eye on the conduct of the Iraq invasion.

    Both wars were scuppered by incompetence, but would victory have obscured that flawed decision-making? Would the half-truths and lack of accountability from peers have been let through a serious examination? If the wars had been won, would anyone care about the disturbing detail?

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Iraq and Lebanon, that's what happens when you don't win

    by Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz

    Jack Valenti, the movie industry's top lobbyist in Washington, who passed away last week at 85, was among the late president Lyndon Johnson's closest advisers during the tumultuous days of the Vietnam War. As his memoirs, scheduled to be published this summer, will attest, he remained Johnson's loyal supporter. According to Valenti, Johnson provided an easy target for those who wished to blame him for the ongoing American involvement in Vietnam, but in retrospect, it was obvious that "the Democratic right and the Republicans would have torn Johnson to pieces" if he - president John F. Kennedy's ill-experienced successor - had decided to cut America's losses abroad by leaving.

    And that is the inherent problem with analyzing politicians' decisions in hindsight: The consequences of their actions are well known, whereas the possible ramifications of abstaining from those actions are pure guesswork.

    A fine example of this could be seen in the words of Senator Hillary Clinton during the recent debate among the Democratic presidential candidates. When she was asked to explain why she had voted in favor of the war in Iraq, she replied: "It was a sincere vote based on the information available to me at the time. If I knew then what I now know, I would not have voted that way." President George W. Bush, in a moment of frankness, could have provided a similar answer to that question.

    The American retrospection on the war in Iraq is something that Israel can identify with, given that it is currently in the throes of the Winograd report, dedicated to the examination of the government's performance during the Second Lebanon War. America is reviewing Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq; Israel is reviewing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's decision to launch last summer's war in Lebanon. The similarities are easy to see.

    In both Jerusalem and Washington, more embarrassing discoveries concerning the two wars emerge with every passing day. This is what happens when nations go to war, but fail to deliver victory.

    In comparing the media's differing approach to World War II and the Vietnam War, Prof. Douglas Porch wrote in the Naval War College Review shortly before the 2003 invasion of Iraq that "it is not the presence of censorship in World War II making the coverage different, but the absence of victory in Vietnam." In other words, it was the difference between victory and defeat that dictated the media's favorable coverage of World War II, despite all the internal struggles between its generals, compared to the critical coverage of the Vietnam War.

    The difference between the Israeli process of retrospection and the American one stems from the fact that the two countries have very different systems of government. American legislators are mounting a fierce attack on their president, but they cannot oust him. He will preside until 2009. The Israeli predicament is the exact opposite: Lawmakers are refraining from any action that might bring the prime minister down in order to keep from going down with him. Still, it does seem that Bush may see a new Israeli prime minister during his own term in office.

    In a new book slated for release today, former CIA head George Tenet writes of the hasty decision to embark on the Iraq War: "There was never a serious debate that I know of within the administration about the imminence of the Iraqi threat." According to Tenet, the decision to go to war was made in Bush's inner circle, without a proper examination of the ramifications. But the same applies to the enemy: Hezbollah failed to foresee the severity of Israel's military response, just as former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein failed to anticipate the severity of the impending threat from the United States. Both Arab leaders believed that their respective foes would hesitate to strike. They both attributed an exaggerated degree of cowardice - and, it would seem in retrospect, intelligence - to their adversaries.

    Nor were Olmert and Bush the only ones on their sides to misinterpret the situation. They enjoyed the overwhelming support of most of their constituents when they gave the order to go to war. They provided compelling arguments for war, which remain reasonable even in retrospect: They promised to remove an ongoing threat and pledged to hound the terrorists and their sponsors. Bush decorated his war with the promise to export democracy to the Arab world. Olmert embellished his with the promise to retrieve the Israeli soldiers whom Hezbollah had abducted.

    And so, we arrive at the conclusion that the Israeli public stands to learn from the Winograd report what the American public has learned following the Iraq War: Successful leaders require good judgment, moderation and farsightedness. In lieu of these, they must produce victories on the battlefield.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  2. #2
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: Victory validates decisions

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost
    Both wars were scuppered by incompetence, but would victory have obscured that flawed decision-making? Would the half-truths and lack of accountability from peers have been let through a serious examination? If the wars had been won, would anyone care about the disturbing detail?
    Had they won, no one would have cared if the soldiers were dressed in drag, carried pink rifles, and smoked pot from dawn to dusk.

    Victory excuses much, if not all.
    Unto each good man a good dog

  3. #3

    Default Re: Victory validates decisions

    Since this orignated as an STW board, a semi relevant quote

    Toranaga (through Mariko, the interpeter):
    I am told that until recently Holland was a
    vassal of the Spanish. How do you justify
    rebellion against a lawful lord?

    Blackthorn:
    There were mitigating circumstances.

    Toranaga (forcefully):
    There are no mitigating circumstances. Not in
    a rebellion of a vassal against his lord.

    Blackthorn (pauses):
    Unless you win.

    Toranaga (laughs for awhile):
    Yes, yes, foreigner with the impossible-to-
    pronounce-name, you name the one mitigating
    circumstance which justifies it...



    edit: woohoo 50 posts in 2 and a half years (plus some lurking time) not bad at all . .
    Last edited by Yawning Angel; 04-30-2007 at 12:04.
    I'm not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information - Calvin -

  4. #4
    Cynic Senior Member sapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default Re: Victory validates decisions

    It's hard to say.

    Victory at any cost? No, I doubt that any government would be free from criticism if it let too many of its citizens die overseas without seemingly achieving anything.

    But will victory excuse mistakes? Of course it will.

    The problem is, of course, that the very mistakes that victory will excuse make it ever harder to achieve...
    From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
    We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer

  5. #5
    Enlightened Despot Member Vladimir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In ur nun, causing a bloody schism!
    Posts
    7,906

    Default Re: Victory validates decisions

    Quote Originally Posted by Beirut
    Had they won, no one would have cared if the soldiers were dressed in drag, carried pink rifles, and smoked pot from dawn to dusk.

    Victory excuses much, if not all.
    Well yea! Americans (in my experience) don't care much about dead soldiers as long as they're not the front page of the newspaper. Really Banquo, watch Gladiator .

    "People always love victories brother."

    ...

    "He will bring them death, and they will love him for it."


    Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
    How do you motivate your employees? Waterboarding, of course.
    Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pinten
    Down with dried flowers!
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  6. #6
    Filthy Rich Member Odin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Just West of Boston
    Posts
    1,973

    Default Re: Victory validates decisions

    Olmert does looked doomed and thus the new arab thrust to get a peace deal done. Why? Because Mr Netanyahu and likud are waiting in the wings with popular support and a right wing hawk adgenda.

    Israeli governments fall pretty regularly, I think this report might be a catalyst for a change in government.
    There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.

    Sua Sponte

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO