Personally, I have no problem with Special OPS continuing their mission, though it must be overseen closely and conditionally - i.e. defined as a training and oversight mission to Iraqi intelligence. The USAF will have a place in any administration that follows Bush43's - it is a gimme, and a necessity for any possible stability. The threat of bombs falling from no where, anywhere, any time is a deffinate detterent to the building of perminent bases by any terrorist factions, and may tends to keep the present Iraqi admin. in line.Originally Posted by spmetla
As to supplying the Iraqi military with high tech munitions or armour - let them prove themselves to being committed to uniting the country as a nation first. Rather than pleasing Bush, let them prove to America that they care about their entire population and not just one sect (Shia).
Bottom line, for me, is we can't simply "be gone", but we must withdraw our troops to a safer position in the region. There is absolutely no reason for us to waste or risk the lives of our military personell for some unattainable goals that must be met by the nation's government we are now assisting.
Note: it was a fubar for us to invade, but to conceed entirely today would be as irresponsable as it was for us to leave behind all the Vietnamese that supported us in 'nam (and all the illegitate orphans, etc.). There must be a middle point, not a total surrender point - we must adjust to. Not a new day same thing, as the Bushies want - but, a new day, new way. Lets get real and not just political about the situation that Bush created. We cannot desert a situation simply because it is the easy way - but, we cannot continue as we are. We need a realistic political plan - as I said before, we must involve all the surrounding nations willing to assisting us in contributing to the stability of the region. It is time to get real about Iraq, and not just make it a political point that most Americans could care less about anyway.
![]()
Bookmarks