Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Defining victory in Iraq

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member KafirChobee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Local Yokel, USA
    Posts
    1,020

    Default Re: Defining victory in Iraq

    The latest definition of victory - straight out of Dubya's mouth, "Sucess is not no violence".

    So, we have no plans to return the peace to pre-invasion days. We would be happy if it settled down to a Darfur situation though.
    Last edited by KafirChobee; 05-13-2007 at 05:42.
    To forgive bad deeds is Christian; to reward them is Republican. 'MC' Rove
    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    ]Clowns to the right of me, Jokers to the left ... here I am - stuck in the middle with you.

    Save the Whales. Collect the whole set of them.

    Better to have your enemys in the tent pissin' out, than have them outside the tent pissin' in. LBJ

    He who laughs last thinks slowest.

  2. #2
    Coffee farmer extraordinaire Member spmetla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Kona, Hawaii
    Posts
    3,015

    Default Re: Defining victory in Iraq

    That's quite an assumption, how does leaving "no violence" out of a definition for victory mean that a situation similiar to Darfur is acceptable. I don't like Bush but that statement is being taken completely out of context, so long as "crusaders" are there we will have some violence happening along with the usual strife between the Sunnis and Shias. I still believe that so long as the Iraqi government is reasonably stable and not about to be toppled by the rival parties within that we'll have achieved a success, this is also coupled with that government not doing a purge of enemies the moment the US looks away.
    Last edited by spmetla; 05-13-2007 at 08:54.

    "Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?"
    -Abraham Lincoln


    Four stage strategy from Yes, Minister:
    Stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
    Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
    Stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
    Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.

  3. #3
    Member Member KafirChobee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Local Yokel, USA
    Posts
    1,020

    Default Re: Defining victory in Iraq

    Quote Originally Posted by spmetla
    That's quite an assumption, how does leaving "no violence" out of a definition for victory mean that a situation similiar to Darfur is acceptable. I don't like Bush but that statement is being taken completely out of context, so long as "crusaders" are there we will have some violence happening along with the usual strife between the Sunnis and Shias. I still believe that so long as the Iraqi government is reasonably stable and not about to be toppled by the rival parties within that we'll have achieved a success, this is also coupled with that government not doing a purge of enemies the moment the US looks away.
    It is not "no violence", it is "not no violence". In other words, when Bush & Co. determine that the level of violence in Iraq reaches there determined level of acceptablitiy (maybe equal to the Watts riots), he will proclaim victory (again) and begin a withdrawal of our troops presence.

    Victory in Iraq is being redefined on almost a daily basis by the Bushys. Heck, Ms. Rice even said that the reason we are in Iraq is because the government invited us there - though I have a great deal of problem with this statement since I have no memory of Saddam asking us for help. Maybe she meant the present government of Iraq, it was a premonition from god; or some such. Actually it is something much simpler - they (Bushys) keep reaching back to things that worked in previous administrations to justify their own fubars, this one was based on the supposed Diem asking for help (they tend to forget we allowed the coup, ultimately his assassination, that overthrew him). It is as though they feel a need to continue to justify their reasons for invasion, and our continued occupation by constantly revising them - sooner or later, one of them might have a ring of validity that someone outside their true believer circle might buy into - after all the `wmd' thing worked once. If a blind man keeps swining a hammer at a nail, in time he may actually hit it. That seems to be their philosophy.

    Btw, Your points are well taken. But, according to a report from our own intelligence oversight there, the present Shia government has already secretly set up their own secret police along the same lines as Saddam. So, once we leave it is inevitable that a strongman (or Ayatollah) will emerge and begin rounding up all the usual suspects - that is anyone that disagrees with them. It is inevitable, and there ain't a damn thing we can do about.

    Not no violence.
    Last edited by KafirChobee; 05-13-2007 at 20:29.
    To forgive bad deeds is Christian; to reward them is Republican. 'MC' Rove
    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    ]Clowns to the right of me, Jokers to the left ... here I am - stuck in the middle with you.

    Save the Whales. Collect the whole set of them.

    Better to have your enemys in the tent pissin' out, than have them outside the tent pissin' in. LBJ

    He who laughs last thinks slowest.

  4. #4
    Awaiting the Rapture Member rotorgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore Toto....
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: Defining victory in Iraq

    I define Victory in Iraq as not having to be deployed, or watch my fellow military bretheren be deployed to such a worthless piece of ground that is infested by Sodomites and women beaters any more. Unfortunately, the powers that be have gotten us into a situation designed to make them and thier defense contrating freinds a great deal of money for a long time-all coming from the taxpayers mind you.

    I believe that that is what they define victory as: a chance to give the military-industrial money making machine that was created during the cold war a means to continue making money. They have achieved what they desired-an unwinnable morass that we cannot leave without a major loss of national honor, that will require a long term (and I mean decades) military presence in the region, all needing the production capacities and services of thier industrial friends. It's like One Source on steroids for them.

    By 2009, the culprits will all be down at the ranch counting thier billions while the poor and middle class finish the dirty work.

    For me, the quicker we leave the better.
    Last edited by rotorgun; 05-13-2007 at 20:54.
    Rotorgun
    ...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
    Onasander

    Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.

  5. #5
    EB II Romani Consul Suffectus Member Zaknafien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Somewhere inside the Military-Industrial Complex
    Posts
    3,607

    Default Re: Defining victory in Iraq

    amen brother. victory will not be had until the citizens of America wake up and refuse to accept the war profiteering and criminal actions of the corporations and their administration puppets.


    "urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. / aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum." --Suetonius, Life of Caesar

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO