Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Which faction should I play first?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    An Imperfect Follower of Light Member Wolfman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Playing my Guitar
    Posts
    654

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    I most agree with Bopa and the Erant. Both the Casse and the Carthaginians have Excellent starting positions. But I would also recommend the Saba because they start at the bottom of the map on the arabian peninsula and start out kinda simiular to the before mentioned factions, but also provide a challenge because of the Arche to the North and the Ptolemies to the west. My other Choices are the Getai, Saka, Sweboz, Lusotannan, and both Gallic factions
    Tales of Gods and Kings - An Arverni AAR-DEAD
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...82#post1930882
    A People of the Mist - Casse AAR-ALIVE!!!!
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showth...Mist-Casse-AAR

  2. #2

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    Try not to pick factions that are already engaged in wars and surrounded by enemies.So avoid epeirus,koinon hellenon and macedonia.Bactria is also very difficult due to great distance between the cities

  3. #3

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    Nah Baktria is pretty easy. Very nice heavy inf/cav/missiles and rich due to the very wealthy area, and weak Saka and Parthians, your only real threat is the Seleucids.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  4. #4

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    Rome's military is super easy to use to a reasonable degree of efficiency and for awhile you will only be pacifying the rebel cities after kicking out the Epirotes. Changing the reforms to more reasonable dates will make this even better (I use 250/220/195).

    The military of successor factions is not going to be as easy as the Romans or the barbarians.

    Ignoring the more complicated Steppe factions, Carthage, the Getai, and the Sweboz have good continental start positions and reasonable military, though Carthage might be a bit tricky.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    I say Rome is probably the best starting faction. Starts with good economy, easily defended position, no big nasty neighbors that one will have to fight immediately.
    We have this almost mythical tree, given to us by the otherwise hostile people in the east to symbolize our friendship and give us permission to send caravans through their lands. It could be said to symbolize the wealth and power of our great nation. Cut it down and make me a throne.

  6. #6
    EB Token Radical Member QwertyMIDX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Providence, Rhode Island
    Posts
    5,898

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    Quote Originally Posted by Veris
    Changing the reforms to more reasonable dates will make this even better (I use 250/220/195).
    In what why are those dates more reasonable? They're certainly less historically accurate.
    History is for the future not the past. The dead don't read.


    Operam et vitam do Europae Barbarorum.

    History does not repeat itself. The historians repeat one another. - Max Beerbohm

  7. #7

    Default Re: Which faction should I play first?

    Oh they certainly are less historically accurate. But playing a 150+ year campaign is very lengthy amount of time considering how long turns take in a large empire, and it's something I don't have the time to do.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO