EB on M/M?

[kalkwerk]

Did anyone play this mod on M/M?

Im just curious wether the ai is acting more logical in diplomacy on medium than very hard.

[Kebabson]

As far as I know this mod is made to play M/M.

greetings kebab

[Foot]

Nah, it is meant to be played on VH/M. Very Hard for Campaign, Medium for Battle.

I can't remember if the difficulty effects the diplomacy engine, it may do.

Foot

[Miles Sueborum]

I play on M/M, because I hoped to have an AI acting more reasonable...
For years I was Allied with the Romans - than, while they were in war with carthargo, the Haedui and the Averni - they attacked one of my settlements - and do see no reason for a ceasefire...
My Armies looted Italy unpunished, the romans lost any major battle and I offered lots of mnai + 3 towns for a ceasefire - they didn't accept...
The Haedui, who than were allied with me, also attacked me for no reason (I grow to hate their geasatea-armies including more than five of these combined with heavy cavalery ) ^^

So it propably doesn't matter which difficulty you select for the campeign game - the AI will always try to be as unreasonable as possible ^^

[pansoiatr]

I think that in vanilla rtw and in eb diplomacy is secondary to making war so i wouldnt count in it very much

[Warmaster Horus]

Basically in VH, if you border the AI, even if you're allied, then it's War.
Worse is some of the stupid demands. I just had Makedon demand of me (Rome) to become their Protectorate, and hand over Sparta. That town is the only one I hold in Southern Greece, and I own the Illyrian Coast, after a long war with Epirus (I try to keep things slow). Anyway, the most ridiculous part of this, is that I landed two Legions (polybian) right before the AI asked.

So, moral of that:AI doesn't respect any treaties. Except, I find, when offering them a tribute of 100-400 for a time. Then, they become reasonable.