Poll: what is better?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: whats better

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member IceWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, IA misplaced Southerner
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: whats better

    Archers have flame and range going for them. I don't bother with peltasts unless I'm in an early Rome campaign.
    "They shall know the power of thy sword" ManoWar

  2. #2
    Member Member Celt Centurion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The state of Oregon
    Posts
    326

    Default Re: whats better

    Quote Originally Posted by IceWolf
    Archers have flame and range going for them. I don't bother with peltasts unless I'm in an early Rome campaign.
    Ditto. When archers are available, I start phasing peltasts and other spear throwers out. They have much more ammo. Flaming arrows help especially when your foe is sending armored elephants.

    I also look forward to archer upgrades, such as Roman archer auxilia, pharaoh's archers, and the German archers. Other factions have good ones as well.

    In the XGM mod, Cretan archers and "picked Cretan archers" can also be recruited. The only problem is shipping them all over to be retrained as they can only be retrained there in Crete.

    Besides, archery is a sport in which I also enjoy competing in.

    Strength and Honor

    Celt Centurion

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO