Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 77

Thread: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

  1. #31
    Member Member Jubee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    I have plan some more dwarven tech system.

    From cities you could get Miners, Slayers (Troll/Giant), Rangers and warmachines. I think that Miners and Slayers should be get from cities because that is the place where civilians really live and Miners and Slayers are civilians right? Or then Rangers will go to castle tech system and there could be Clansmen.

    From castles you could get real army. Warriors, Quarrelers, Thunderers, Longbeards, Ironbreackers, warmachines etc.

    Should Hammerers be general's bodyguard or independent unit or both?

    If racial bonuses are doable then Dwarfs should get bonus to mining profit and maybe cheaper armour.


    Is there going to be more faction threads. Empire and Bretonnia have units so they could have their own threads. Especially The Mighty Sigmarite Empire.

    That's all... For this time.

  2. #32

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Bonuses for mining are tricky because the abilites of buildings are set for all factions. While it is possible for dwarves to build a different set of mines that will provide more bonuses if this factions is conqured then another faction could build a regular mine in addtion to the dwarven one. It way be better if dwarves could build more mine related buildings or upgrade to a higher level of mines than other factions.

    I believe that the EDU can be modified to change a unit's upgrade cost, so it is possible that dwarves can get cheaper upgrades.
    4 Seasons (6 Empires battle for supremecy); 3.0 version
    Total War Eras (start at 970, 1080, 1200, 1300, 1400, or 1500); 2.4 version
    Eras Total Conquest (start at 1230, 1346, 1547); 1.2 version

  3. #33

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Building effects can be set by faction.

  4. #34
    Member Member overkill1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe, The Netherlands
    Posts
    21

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by Jubee
    I have plan some more dwarven tech system.

    From cities you could get Miners, Slayers (Troll/Giant), Rangers and warmachines. I think that Miners and Slayers should be get from cities because that is the place where civilians really live and Miners and Slayers are civilians right? Or then Rangers will go to castle tech system and there could be Clansmen.

    From castles you could get real army. Warriors, Quarrelers, Thunderers, Longbeards, Ironbreackers, warmachines etc.

    Should Hammerers be general's bodyguard or independent unit or both?

    If racial bonuses are doable then Dwarfs should get bonus to mining profit and maybe cheaper armour.


    Is there going to be more faction threads. Empire and Bretonnia have units so they could have their own threads. Especially The Mighty Sigmarite Empire.

    That's all... For this time.

    Slayers aren't just civilians. every dwarf can become a slayer.

    a slayer is basicly a dwarf that has done something bad etc.. and wants to redeem his sins by finding the strongest enemy possibly and die a honorable death in battle

  5. #35
    Annoying Warhammer know-it-all Member DrZoidberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    225

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by overkill1991
    Slayers aren't just civilians. every dwarf can become a slayer.

    a slayer is basicly a dwarf that has done something bad etc.. and wants to redeem his sins by finding the strongest enemy possibly and die a honorable death in battle
    Slayers in armies are Slayers who've gone out on their troll-/dragon-/whatever-slaying quest. Killed the beast but survived. Since they survived and the only way the can die honorable is in battle they give their services to a Dwarf lord/thane.

    Since regular army is raised in castles, and militias are raised in cities, it makes most sense that Slayers returning from quests would gravitate toward castles only. They're basically the elite of elite. Just not so well armoured.
    Sorry you must have been boring. -Dr Zoidberg

  6. #36

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    As far as I know most slayers are no elite troops. The stats of troll slayers are the same (apart from Ld) as simple warriors (at least in my old dwarf army book), they take advantage of being some sort of berserker to have easier fights against monsters and heroes as well as being unbreakable. They are doom seekers, as soon as they see an opportunity for a heroic death, they run towards it no matter what, may it be battle (if by any chance there is one around) or beasts (which I agree is the most common starting point).

    In Grudge Bearer they describe slayers running in front of their armies towards a huge chaos dwarf army even if it's a waste of good dwarfs...they should be almost impossible to control (charge without orders and the such).

    In Gotrek and Felix (dun remember which opus...think it's dragon slayer) they speak of the temple of Grimnir in Karak Kadrin being the center of the slayer community and the place where they solemnly take their oaths...therefore imho slayers should be “trained” wherever there is a temple of Grimnir be it town or castle.

    Another suggestion is that slayer units surviving battles (shame on them) pick up negative points: create unrest in settlements, disband...a massive bonus would be to have them refusing to fight when the odds of the battle are in favour of their army

    Another suggestion for temples and deities:
    temple of Grungni
    improved armors and/or weapons

    temple of Grimnir
    give xp to units or allows training of slayers (simple temple gives troll slayers, more advanced giant slayers,...)

    temple of Valaya
    bonus against unrest or faster population increase

  7. #37

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by Casuir
    Building effects can be set by faction.
    Can you please explain how this can be achieved without creating a whole new building just for the dwarves?
    4 Seasons (6 Empires battle for supremecy); 3.0 version
    Total War Eras (start at 970, 1080, 1200, 1300, 1400, or 1500); 2.4 version
    Eras Total Conquest (start at 1230, 1346, 1547); 1.2 version

  8. #38
    Bringer of the End Times Member alexader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Athens in Greece
    Posts
    194

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Please tell me then what will be the goods if the slayers die in battle.what they will rise from their graves?ok i am just kidding,but the opposite may be intersted
    "VAE VICTUS"

  9. #39

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by uanime5
    Can you please explain how this can be achieved without creating a whole new building just for the dwarves?
    put "requires factions { whatever, }" after the effect.

  10. #40

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    So for the mines it would be

    Code:
                   mine_resource 7
                            mine_resource 9 requires factions {dwarves, }
    Would this give the dwarves' a mine resource of 9 or 16?
    4 Seasons (6 Empires battle for supremecy); 3.0 version
    Total War Eras (start at 970, 1080, 1200, 1300, 1400, or 1500); 2.4 version
    Eras Total Conquest (start at 1230, 1346, 1547); 1.2 version

  11. #41

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    How about gyrocopter? That would be awesome...
    Mod leader of Warhammer; Total War


  12. #42

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    @uaime the second one, you put requires factions {Elves, orcs and everyone else, } after the first bonus so the dwarfs wont get it.

  13. #43

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Amazing work with the dwarfs so far, they look bether than many other gameplay dwarfs proffesionaly made by paid artists! But i am a little concerned about their balance in gameplay.

    Remember that the dwarfs who are lacking the speed and mobility of other races and rely more on armor and guns, is a defencive race. They are most happy when they can fortify themselves on a hilltop and gun down the enemy from afar.

    I know many TW players hate the ideas of "defencive" and "Offensive" armies, so i was kinda hoping you culd make it so that the dwarfs are less aggressive in battles, but not overly defencive.

    The dwarfs have no cavalry whatsoever. But have the strongest armor in the old world. you have to find a way to balance this, as dwarfs wuld get easely Outmanovered by their quicker enemies, beeing surounded will be evryday bouissness for the average dwarf warrior, make him an effective fighter to counter this...

    I have full faith in this mod, I assume you will sort it out..

  14. #44

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    The issue with Dwarves will be covered in balancing. They will have strong morale, and good defensive ability. To offset this, they will also be relatively expensive to maintain.

    Their build times for armies will be long, and they will be hard to build up to huge scales for a major offensive. This is only natural for them. While they build and prepare, they will be hard to overrun or destroy.

    Their lack of mobility will be an essential tactic to fight against them, and should be the over-riding consideration when playing them.

    As far as basic stats go, they are not impetuous or ill-disciplined, and when facing them, they will be hard to break. We will try and replicate the basic dwarf attitude as far as teh game AI will allow.
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  15. #45

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    OK....built so far for this faction:

    1) Crew ( light armour and an axe when needed )
    2) Miners
    3) Warrior ( chainmail and an assortment of axes with shields )
    4) Heavy Warrior ( breastplate or heavy scale armour, 2 handed weapon )
    5) Longbeards. Warriors with...er....longer beards and fancy helmets!
    6) Iron Breakers. Stacks of armour!
    7) Quarellers
    8) Thunderers
    9) TrollSlayers

    Only thing left to make are the artillery units now.

    Unless, of course, someone can come up with something vital that I have overlooked! Hammerers were considered... but they are really only heavy infantry...which I have already made. Should I just modify the heavy infantry to make them hammerers? Would only need to delete the axes in the MS3D model!
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  16. #46

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    aren't Hammerers the dwarfen body guard unit as they dont have cavalry?
    For Middenheim & The Empire!

  17. #47
    Member Member overkill1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Europe, The Netherlands
    Posts
    21

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwian
    OK....built so far for this faction:

    1) Crew ( light armour and an axe when needed )
    2) Miners
    3) Warrior ( chainmail and an assortment of axes with shields )
    4) Heavy Warrior ( breastplate or heavy scale armour, 2 handed weapon )
    5) Longbeards. Warriors with...er....longer beards and fancy helmets!
    6) Iron Breakers. Stacks of armour!
    7) Quarellers
    8) Thunderers
    9) TrollSlayers

    Only thing left to make are the artillery units now.

    Unless, of course, someone can come up with something vital that I have overlooked! Hammerers were considered... but they are really only heavy infantry...which I have already made. Should I just modify the heavy infantry to make them hammerers? Would only need to delete the axes in the MS3D model!
    I think you should.

    A hammerer is much cooler than a ''heavy warrior'', and as you said, a hammerer is basicly the same, they only use big 2h hammers to smash people with :)

  18. #48
    Member Member Taranaich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The bleak moors of Scotland
    Posts
    491

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    I agree, although I like two-handed axes as much as the next bearded warrior I think it's more appropriate to have Hammerers. They would serve pretty much the same function as Heavy Warriors, but already have a little history in the GW universe. Plus smashing foes with big fecking hammers is quintessentially dwarfish if you ask me.

    You could always salvage the Heavy Warrior as an officer for the warriors.

    "Know, O Prince, that between the years when the oceans drank Atlantis and the gleaming cities, and the years of the rise of the Sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of, when shining kingdoms lay spread across the world, like blue mantles beneath the stars...
    Is fhearr fheuchainn na bhith san duil.

  19. #49
    Member Member lanky316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Huntingdon, Cambs, England
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Quote Originally Posted by Enthes
    aren't Hammerers the dwarfen body guard unit as they dont have cavalry?
    This is how I would consider doing them, but of course, you're the guys in charge!

  20. #50

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    OK...Hammerers they will become

    I will add a couple of extra hammer variations to replace the axes, and that will make them nice for Hammerers. I will also add a standard bearer variant of the basic design so I can make officer units for the others.
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  21. #51
    Daimyo, Sultan & True Roman Member Crian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Manila, Philippines
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Nice Bwian! So... where are the pictures?



    "Why did we attack the Iceni? Why did we destroy that cargo? I can live with being a pawn if the game makes sense!" - Wingman, Mission 3: The Romans Blunder, Freespace 2

  22. #52

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    The 'heavy warrior' should still be included, as the dwarf warriors get a 2h axe equipment option in the army book.

    Basically 2h axes are preferred by some clans fr thier warriors, hammererers are bodyguards only.
    Mod leader of Warhammer; Total War


  23. #53

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    I'll do a variant on the basic warrior with 2H weapons. Won't take mych effort to do... I'll use the longer scale/chain option I have done for the Hammerers, and add back the 2h axes. Throw in some helmet variants and some extra arm-armour and gauntlets, and we are done.

    Just need to finish off some skins, and then I can screenshot it.


    Just now, I am trying to make sense of the extra files that make up the Artillery pieces. That...and why there are 2 very different models for a Dwarf Cannon. One 'traditional' Napoleonic type pattern...and one that looks like it came off a warship.
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  24. #54

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    What kind have you planned for bodyguards? surly you will not use "generals bodyguards"

  25. #55

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    im sure that they will use the units that specify themselves as generals body guards empire greatswords / knights dwarfs hammerers chaos chosen warriors / knights
    For Middenheim & The Empire!

  26. #56

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    Dwarves will have a dwarf unit for Bodyguard purposes. I am going to do a 'Heavy Infantry' unit which will serve as a bodyguard type unit.

    For our mod, each faction will have to have it's own unique bodyguard units. Chaos will have Chaos Knights...Tomb Kings will have Tomb-Guards.... and so on. No way would we use stock 'bodyguard' units!

    I also need to do some General models for each faction. That will be a challenge!
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  27. #57

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    I hope to see some lords ridding dragons and such
    For Middenheim & The Empire!

  28. #58

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    OK...that's the Dwarves just about done!

    Just finished making all the low detail lods for the Dwarf faction, and put placeholder stock siege weapons in forthe full set of dwarf siege artillery.

    we have:

    Crewmen
    Miners
    Warriors
    Heavy Warriors
    Hammerers
    Iron Breakers
    Slayers
    Longbeards
    Quarrellers
    Thunderers

    plus a musician and standard bearer

    artillery is

    Bolt Thrower
    Grudge Thrower
    Flame Cannon
    Organ Gun
    Cannon

    Phew.

    Just need to touch up a few textures ( grey up the longbeards beards, add some colour to the shield textures... that sort of thing ) and then we are done. First faction to be finished!
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

  29. #59

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    sounds good.
    you should make a thread with a list of all the races units that are complete then evryone can see at a glance whats been done
    For Middenheim & The Empire!

  30. #60

    Default Re: Faction thread 4: Dwarves

    That is definitely going to happen as soon as I get the time. I want to get a good set of screenshots up, and have a proper 'Faction' thread for each as a showcase. The thread itself will be locked...since these threads form the discussion threads, and the finsihed faction threads will only get clogged up with comments and chat, which is self defeating really.

    I can also mirror those posts over at TWC, to keep the profile up. I also considered setting up a website to showcase the finished factions. Don't know if that would work better, or just take up more of my time that I could be devoting to other stuff!
    Careless Orc Costs Lives!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO