Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman
Well yeah , but better pay must be linked to better productivity and a complete management shake up .
They took the contract on a 4:2:1:1 basis , they have competely failed to deliver , so dock their pay and sack a few of them to send them a message to get their act together .
What in the world are you talking about? You should just stick with your orginial comment that a better commander in chief is required.

Better pay for the military has been an ongoing issue since before I joined the service in the late 1980's, and will be an continuing issue for many years.

You know the same military that has had success and failures under different Commander in Chief's over the past several decades.