GAO report on rebuilding Iraq. A noteworthy graphic:
GAO report on rebuilding Iraq. A noteworthy graphic:
and yet the supply of electricty doesn't meet demand.
Does the increased violence include the increase in Al-Qaeda attacks against united tribal leaders trying to remove terrorists from the equation in building their nation? I believe it does. Has anyone else noted the increase attacks during our election cycle?...demand for electricity has been stimulated by a
growing economy and a surge in consumer purchases of appliances and
electronics. In addition, electricity is subsidized in Iraq, which leads to
increased demand.
"There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."
"The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."
The GAO is wonderful because its often just the facts based on data available not politics. Yet another ringing endorsement for removing ourselves from Iraq sooner rather then later
There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.
Sua Sponte
You guys are making OBL look like a geniusThe GAO is wonderful because its often just the facts based on data available not politics. Yet another ringing endorsement for removing ourselves from Iraq sooner rather then laterI bet most of these attacks are not on our troops. Arent US troop casusalties down?
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Attacks and casualties are two different reports Gwain, I am generally suspect of anything that comes out of the government post Bush and WMD, but the GAO usually uses good data from what I have seen in the past.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.
Sua Sponte
Does it matter if us troop casualties are down if the civilian losses are going up, you think?Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
Common Unreflected Drinking Only Smartens
Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
US casualties in Iraq
Thanks thats why I asked. I looked and could only find an article stating they were down in march. Their not terribly up either considering the violence seems to have escalated. Again I wish the Iraqis would vote on whether they want us to stay or not. Please let then say go.
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Thanks for the link. I would add that with dealing with such small numbers (not meaning to minimize the human cost but in meaning the reality of math) the fact that "wounded" have not been released for 2006 or 2007 leaves the door wide open to degrees of increase if at all or even to a greater degree than some think it currently is. Deaths to wounds ratios are not always equally and absolutely proportional.Originally Posted by Ser Clegane
-edit-
So its safe to say death totals are higher, but the full picture of casualties is unclear.
Last edited by ShadeHonestus; 05-24-2007 at 19:25.
"There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."
"The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."
Aside from the overall increase, which is blatant, it also seems to indicate that there's a growing proportion of the attacks being made against Iraqi forces and civilians. Guess that's the civil war that's not happening, then....
Being as I'm not going to read the full 64 page report in the five minutes before I go home, do those figures indicate number of attacks or number of casualties in attacks? 5,000 a month sounds hell of a lot, either way round, so what actually constitutes an "attack"? And I'm sure Iraqi civilian population is sustaining far higher casualties than the occupying forces, so is, say, a car-bomb in a crowded Baghdad market counted as "one attack" along with a sniper's bullet ricocheting off a hummer also being "one attack"?
I'm sure I'll have a lot of debate to catch up on tomorrow morning....
ANCIENT: TW
A mod for Medieval:TW (with VI)
Discussion forum thread
Download A Game of Thrones Mod v1.4
Excellent questions all around imo. Its important to know what things mean. I remember when deaths from regular criminal activity and even some natural deaths weren't being subtracted from daily reported "death tolls" with retractions and revisions happening on page 10002, eight days later. This report does seem solid aside from making all relevant and necessary definitions.
Indeed, does an attack on the occupying forces that also constitutes civilian casualties and civilian targets and vice versa get chalked up twice or which is determined what and what are the criteria. Going to eventually read more than the first paragraph of the methodology used and hopefully answer some of these....Originally Posted by macsen rufus
"There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."
"The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."
It does to me. As has been pointed out its to be expected that the closer they get to a real solution the more violence there will be. Ever hear of the Battle of the Bulge? Did that mean we should have packed up and left?Does it matter if us troop casualties are down if the civilian losses are going up, you think?
Fighting for Truth , Justice and the American way
Okay I covered the methodology and it just covers the scope of the financial reports as the primary focal point of the release. The graph above which appears in the release is provided by MNFI, haven't' delved far enough there for methodology yet.
"There is a true glory and a true honor; the glory in duty done and the honor in the integrity of principle."
"The truth is this; the march of Providence so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often only see the ebb of the advancing wave. It is history which teaches us to hope."
Nope they are up , both killed and wounded , so are the Iraqi military casualties .I bet most of these attacks are not on our troops. Arent US troop casusalties down?
So how much was you betting ?![]()
You make a good point here Gawain, but I hardly think that the two situations are analogous. WWII was a far different matter from this little shin-dig going on in Iraq. I will admit that it is all about the national will to take casualties for the gains expected. So far, as this report indicates, I can't think if it is worth it. I certainly wouldn't want to sacrifice my life for such a miserable situation such as we have in Iraq. Yet still, we expend more lives, more treasure, more sweat-all for a country that could care less if we fell off the face of the Earth. If you feel that strongly about it, I'll be glad to sign you up with my unit, so that you can share the load any time.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
See you in the trenches Gunga Din.![]()
Last edited by rotorgun; 05-24-2007 at 18:38.
Rotorgun![]()
Onasander...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.
I don't know exactly how accurate these numbers would be, but some of the answers in this thread are much more interesting. Together they constitute a small study in denial. Posters touched by the affliction should (re)read Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly as therapy.Originally Posted by Lemur
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
Bookmarks