Same facts, different conclusion.

Belousov wasn't accepted by the group-think in power. Thankfully overtime his ideas were tested by others and proven to be the most accurate current model.

So to my mind that shows the power of science that it can overcome entrenched thinking and change its models to a more accurate one.

Now can the same be said for religion?

As for Newton vs Einstein, that is not an issue at all. At non-relativistic speeds Einstein's equations are virtually identical to that of Newtons. As far as gravity effecting the mythical apple in the orchard falling form a tree... well the two sets of equations will come up with identical models.

=][=

um, evolution is a fact. sorry if you don't like that.. lol
Incorrect evolution is not a fact. Evolution is a theory that fits certain facts and supported by other facts and theory. Gravity is a theory that fits certain facts as well. We test theories by experiments to find out if the theories will predict the facts that will come out.

Any any "science" television show will say things like "150 million years ago, thus and so happened". As if they know that as a fact. When really they have no proof whatsoever that the Earth was around that long ago but rather they only have their faith that it was based on what other men have told them.
Not difficult with a TIMS or SHRIMP to verify the age of something. Carbon dating is for the short term scale, other isotopes allow million year verification, and others allow for billion year calibration. The age is then supported from other disciplines and theories (stellar formation for instance).