Results 1 to 30 of 84

Thread: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Master Guar Herder Member Guru's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fur trapper post
    Posts
    220

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    Excellent!

    -- Guru
    Pinky: "Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
    The Brain: "The same thing we do every night, Pinky - Try to take over the world!"

  2. #2
    Member Member Phog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    Thanks for the info Doug.


    - Phog
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheogorath
    About as logical as a tree full of monkeys on LSD.

    I'm a little worse for wear, but I'm wearin' it well.

  3. #3
    Typing from the Saddle Senior Member Doug-Thompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    2,455

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    [Edited consumer warning: Scrap this theory. Didn't work. See post #60.]


    Alt-Charge

    Miracle's formula gives a bonus of 3 to a unit with a secondary melee weapon that has an anti-armor bonus. That figure's pretty conservative when attacking the best units. If I understand correctly, having the bonus means that the opponent's armor is effectively halved. Armored swordsmen, for instance, have a base armor figure of 8, making the anti-armor bonus worth 4.

    Even with that conservative figure of 3, there are still eight melee cavalry units that apparently should charge with their secondary weapon instead of their main spear when first attacking a well-armored unit. Here they are, in order of how much difference it should make:

    Russian Druzhina
    Mercenary Albanian Cavalry
    Italian Stradiots
    Byzantine Kataphractoi
    Egyptian Mamluks
    Turkish Quapukulu
    Muslim factions' Late Bodyguard
    Egyptian Royal Mamluks

    Note that Norse War Clergy and Huscarls are honorary members of this category, since they don't have secondary weapons.

    The margin with the conservative figure of "3" is so close on Gothic Knights, English Knights, German Imperial Knights, Mercenary German Knights and Teutonic Knights that Alt-Charging should get serious consideration against well-armored targets, at least until somebody with experience about this comments otherwise.
    Last edited by Doug-Thompson; 06-02-2007 at 23:31.
    "In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns."

  4. #4
    Guardian of the Fleet Senior Member Shahed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leading the formation!
    Posts
    7,918

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    Have'nt got M2 installed at the moment, or I would test it. You'd have to run a test e.g Armored Swordsmen vs Druzhina, just walk them in and see what happens. This would have to be performed against S&S, pikes, 2Hs and spears.
    If you remember me from M:TW days add me on Steam, do mention your org name.

    http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/__shak

  5. #5
    Typing from the Saddle Senior Member Doug-Thompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    2,455

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    You can't just walk them, though. You need a charge because the secondary weapon gets a charge bonus too.
    "In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns."

  6. #6
    Guardian of the Fleet Senior Member Shahed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leading the formation!
    Posts
    7,918

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    Sorry, I always say walk in when I mean don't lance charge.
    Last edited by Shahed; 06-01-2007 at 21:34.
    If you remember me from M:TW days add me on Steam, do mention your org name.

    http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/__shak

  7. #7

    Default Re: Bang per buck: Melee cavalry

    Just curious, what pushed Christian Guard to the top of the list. I've yet to get these in my Moors campaign but I've always thought of them as same price but a bit inferior to the order knights. I don't have the stats with me atm, though, so my recollection could be wrong.

    That list just made me sadder that I got Qapaluku and Janissary musketeers too late in my Turkish campaign. I pretty much owned Egypt and Byzantine with Sipahis and crap. I finished Byzantines off with Janissary heavy infantry and Hashishim. I was mostly cleaning up when I got the Qapakulu and Janissary muskets and I only got to field a few of them in battle.
    Last edited by andrewt; 06-01-2007 at 22:00.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO