Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Marriage

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Del Arroyo
    I'm not saying that gay couples are bad or that they will cause the downfall of family values. I do object to the inclusion of homosexuals in the institution of marriage.
    Fair enough, but the reason you gave for objecting was that marriages should produce children. By which logic, infertile people should not marry. I don't think marriage can be so narrowly defined. What about couples who chose not to have any kids? Is their marriage invalid?

    If two people want to take a shot at having the rest of their lives together, I say let 'em. I'm gonna get rich by being first to market with Gay Divorce Court TV.
    Quote Originally Posted by Big King Sanctaphrax
    This focus on marriage still irks me. Surely what people actually mean is that it's better for children to have two parents? I whole-heartedly agree with that, but it doesn't follow that the parents have to be married.
    Yup, it's demonstrably better for kids to have two parents. More parents = division of labor = efficiencies = better odds for the kindelein. Certainly the parents don't have to be married, but marriage helps people stay together. There are more real consequences to walking out on your wife than there are on leaving your roommate with benefits. People generally think harder and more carefully about committing to marriage than they do when asking a sex buddy to move in.

    When it comes to providing the most stable foundation possible for kids, marriage gives the best odds. Which is not to say that the individual can't give lie to the statistic.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kommodus
    It's interesting that you refer to the focus as "long-standing." By some measures it is, perhaps, yet I remember hearing many Focus on the Family radio broadcasts as a child that never mentioned the issue even once. IIRC they focused on more mundane, every-day family issues.
    You're quite right, Focus on the Family used to be a very different organization, and it was built up by offering practical help with family issues. How it got changed into the political creature that it is now, I really don't know.

    And you're also right that the reaction to the gay marriage movement was just that, a reaction. But it really has taken on a life of its own in the last ten years or so. By "longstanding," I meant a decade, which is not long in geological terms, but an eternity in politics and insect lives.

    Which reminds me, I used an age calculator and found out I am the equivalent of a five-year-old dog. Woof.
    Last edited by Lemur; 06-06-2007 at 04:47.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO