Multiplayer rules thread

[Fondor_Yards]

Why limit HA at all? This isn't RTR. Has anyone played a large number of battles vs an all/most HA army and found it can't be beaten by basicly anything? If so, then we should limit it. Otherwise, let's see if they are too strong or not before we limit them.

[The Internet]

It may not be RTR but the same idea is still applicable to EB and i've also noticed that cav in EB tend to be a lot stronger than they were in RTR (in my campaign, the enemy cav can charge straight into my legionaries and stay there slugging it out untill they get flanked where as in RTR they were like glass and no one would ever dare charge infantry from the front) so it could be even more of a problem in EB.


Would someone like to test a HA army out in MP and see what the facts are before we start going in circles about this?

[Captian Cornelius]

Voted for six horse archers so Parthian historical armies can be built.
Voted for three slingers cause I can't see an army fielding more than that in real life.
Voted 1 black smith 'case that's what you get in the game.
Voted 3 exp because that seems what a 'veteran' would be to me.
Didn’t vote for money because I think that should be decided on in game.

[Pharnakes]

The point of the money vote is for the tourney, not for individual battles, when it is up to the players concerned.

[Sarkiss]

It may not be RTR but the same idea is still applicable to EB and i've also noticed that cav in EB tend to be a lot stronger than they were in RTR (in my campaign, the enemy cav can charge straight into my legionaries and stay there slugging it out untill they get flanked where as in RTR they were like glass and no one would ever dare charge infantry from the front) so it could be even more of a problem in EB.


Would someone like to test a HA army out in MP and see what the facts are before we start going in circles about this?

im willing to do it tomorrow, if my internet is still up.
im not sure i agree about strength of EB's cavalry. i really think their charges, regardless distance to the target, were far more devastaiting in RTR than in EB where you need to calculate the distance.

[Reno Melitensis]

I suggest that all ordinary infantry should have exp. rating on the type of infantry they are. For example levies and citizen militia should have on chevron, light infantry two and so on. Elites and Triari should be the more experienced, like Companian Cavalry, and the General bodyguard. So in a few words I thing that there should be a guide line and rules to take an army to battle.

Cheers.

[bovi]

Relative experience from unit type to unit type is reflected in their base stats.

[Lovejoy]

Not only is HAs overpowerd (prob). They are reeeeally boring to fight too :P

[QwertyMIDX]

As one of the main EB staters, PLEASE don't use lots of experience, it completely breaks the stat system and we're working internally on a way to make it less problematic.

[Sarkiss]

Relative experience from unit type to unit type is reflected in their base stats.

...thus no need to add chevrons. imho, it'd make things less complicated.

[bovi]

Hehe, and 4 people have voted for 9 experience even though it's impossible . Still, a majority wants at least 3 chevrons so far (12 versus 6 who want less than 3), so it appears to be no holds barred on experience.