doc_bean already answered this, I thinkOriginally Posted by Duke of Gloucester
This is the traditional "do we know anything for sure at all" question in philosophy. It depends on how you define "know". The definition of "know" IMO should somehow contain the idea that for something to be known, it must:Originally Posted by Duke of Cloucester
1. be true in reality
2. be possible to prove strongly, so that the probability that it is false is low
3. the proof should be reconstructible by others
Depending on how strong our requirement in no. 2 is, we either know some things, or we know nothing at all.
At least we can probably agree that if we don't know anything for sure in science (where statements are usually well supported and immediately rejected when counter-examples are found) then we don't know anything for sure in religion (where statements are unsupported and not rejected when counter-examples are found), according to this definition.
Bookmarks