Logic is the way. We must train it, practise it, rationality. There must be scientific and philosophical activity.
While I prefer the previous things I just uttered, I am in conflict due to the fact I do believe in a divine entity that is God. But the reason therefor is simple: it had been put into my mind from birth for many a year and is so deeply nested even cold hard rationality can't totally rid the idea or habit (though many times I seem to forget the idea while distracted).
Logically I say this: I see no proof He exists and I see no proof He doesn't exist, but it is plausible He doesn't. But plausibility is not sufficient especially in this case.
EDIT:
Well, it seems Husar kind of made my point already regarding who's right or wrong.
Bookmarks