Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Elephants

  1. #1
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Elephants

    A while ago somebody was asking why the Qarthadastim couldn't recruit armoured elephants. The team replied that was because they had no evidence that the Qarthadastim ever armoured their elephants. Anyway, What I was wanting to ask is; does that mean that other factions that do use amoured elephants (ie, hellenistic factions) can or will be able to, recruit amoured elephants in Numidia?
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  2. #2
    Abou's nemesis Member Krusader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kjøllefjord, Norway
    Posts
    5,723

    Default Re: Elephants

    Quote Originally Posted by Pharnakes
    A while ago somebody was asking why the Qarthadastim couldn't recruit armoured elephants. The team replied that was because they had no evidence that the Qarthadastim ever armoured their elephants. Anyway, What I was wanting to ask is; does that mean that other factions that do use amoured elephants (ie, hellenistic factions) can or will be able to, recruit amoured elephants in Numidia?
    Nope. Forest Elephants were as far as our evidence shows not armored for any battles. Apparently only Indian ones were.
    "Debating with someone on the Internet is like mudwrestling with a pig. You get filthy and the pig loves it"
    Shooting down abou's Seleukid ideas since 2007!

  3. #3
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Elephants

    Any theories why? (too small and weak, or what?)
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  4. #4
    fancy assault unit Member blank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    1,273

    Default Re: Elephants

    Quote Originally Posted by Pharnakes
    Any theories why? (too small and weak, or what?)

    I can't make out over the net if you're joking or not. If you're not, then the African forest elephant is the largest elephant species.
    If you are, then:
    Forest elephants for whatever reason were very rarely used in battle at all (apparently they were not available enough), and thus an armored version would be even more unlikely.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullheadhq View Post
    Now I can even store my dick in EB underwear

  5. #5
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Elephants

    I thought that the affrican forest elephant was seperate from the african plains elephant (that is the largest speicies). Didin't the Romans more or less exterminate the forset elephant, so that now only the pigmy and plains elephants are left in africa?
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  6. #6
    Celtic Cataphracts!!!! Member The Celt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    322

    Cool Re: Elephants

    He's right. Forest Elephants(Aka "Bush" Elephants) are/were a separate species to the African Plains Elephants. And, as far as I know, those Bush Elephants were very small and couldn't support any kind of Metal armor.

    In fact, doesn't a Roman historian mention how the Numidians would paint the outsides of their Howdahs?(Basket Tower thing the Archers/Peltasts ride in) They would paint them so that they looked like they were made of brick to fool their enemies into thinking their Elephants were stronger than they looked. I think it was Polybius who mentioned it but knowing him it could be entirely made up.(Would've been pretty smart of the Numidians if they could've done it though. )
    Achtungaz!!! You vill all zavmit to zeh Svveboz!!!!

    Currently rising to power as:

  7. #7

    Default Re: Elephants

    The African Bush Elephant is the Largest elephant specie in Africa and is not the same as the African Forest Elephant.

    The Asian or Asiatic Elephant (Elephas maximus), sometimes known by the name of its nominate subspecies (the Indian Elephant), is one of the three living species of elephant, and the only living species of the genus Elephas. By the way the Elephas includes the mamooth.

    Now some wiki...

    The African Forest Elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) was until recently considered a subspecies of the African Bush Elephant (Loxodonta africana); however, DNA testing has now shown that there are in fact three extant elephant species: the two African types, formerly considered to be different populations of a single species, the African Elephant, and the South Asian species known as the Indian or Asian Elephant. The North African war elephant of Hannibal fame was a now-extinct fourth species or a subspecies of the Forest Elephant (Loxodonta (africana) pharaoensis[citation needed]); it disappeared around the 1st or 2nd century CE. The disputed Pygmy Elephants of the Congo basin, often assumed to be a separate species (Loxodonta pumilio) by cryptozoologists, are probably Forest Elephants whose diminutive size and/or early maturity is due to environmental conditions.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Elephants

    He's right. Forest Elephants(Aka "Bush" Elephants) are/were a separate species to the African Plains Elephants. And, as far as I know, those Bush Elephants were very small and couldn't support any kind of Metal armor.
    You've got this wrong. The African bush elephant and the plains elephant are the same thing. The forest elephant is a different species. The forest elephants, what the Carthaginians and Numidians would have used, were significantly smaller than the bush elephant and probably not strong enough to support much body armor. The bush elephants, although much larger and stronger (even larger and stronger than most Asian elephants), are nearly impossible to train and were probably used in only limited numbers or possibly not at all.

    Visit the EB Help Required Thread

    "His only addiction was to practice." - John Coltrane, describing Eric Dolphy

    "and thus it cannot be performed, because one cannot perform that which does not exist." - Arnold Schönberg

  9. #9

    Default Re: Elephants

    What if the African bush elephant carried a coconut? Any theories?

    rgds/EoE

  10. #10
    Celtic Cataphracts!!!! Member The Celt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    322

    Cool Re: Elephants

    Quote Originally Posted by tk-421
    You've got this wrong. The African bush elephant and the plains elephant are the same thing. The forest elephant is a different species. The forest elephants, what the Carthaginians and Numidians would have used, were significantly smaller than the bush elephant and probably not strong enough to support much body armor. The bush elephants, although much larger and stronger (even larger and stronger than most Asian elephants), are nearly impossible to train and were probably used in only limited numbers or possibly not at all.
    Weird, I thought the Bush and forest ellies were the same thing. All well learn something new everyday!

    @EoE:Well that depends. Is it a Bush Elephant from South Africa? Or is it a Bush Elephant from Central Africa?
    Last edited by The Celt; 06-17-2007 at 04:07.
    Achtungaz!!! You vill all zavmit to zeh Svveboz!!!!

    Currently rising to power as:

  11. #11
    Member Member DeathEmperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    West Palm Beach, Florida
    Posts
    150

    Default Re: Elephants

    I'll add what I can to this thread as I'm somewhat a veteran of discussions about which elephants were used in warfare by ancient peoples


    The elephants that the Carthaginians, Numidians, and Ptolemaics used in battle were African Forest Elephants, and not the massive and more famous African Plains or Bush elephants species. These elephants were very small, perhaps if I remember correctly, not much larger than an average American car (although what constitutes an average American car is debatable as well ). I think from what I can remember it was only the Ptolemaics and pehaps Numidians who put towers on these elephants. I distinctly remember reading in a book of mine that the Carthaginians never equipped their elephants with towers, although they mave had archers or javelineers riding on their bare backs.

    Turning to the Indian/Asian/Asiatic elephants they were much larger than their Forest elephants cousins (although definitely outmatched by the African Plains/Bush species). They had superior size, stamina (as they are reported as being dowed in bronze armour on many occasions), and battle ferocity. They were also from what i read much more easier to control in battle than Forest elephants, although this could have been caused by the tactic of giving them fermented wine before battle (a tactic used by the Indians for centuries in elephant warfare and may have been adopted by the Seleucids as well).


    It's really late where I am right now, 3:35 am to be exact, so I'll make another contribution to this discussion later if I can.


    "I fought with all that I had, but at the end I was left wounded, bloodied, and broken and asking myself, "Why?"."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO