View Poll Results: TW4 - SP vs MP

Voters
43. This poll is closed
  • a) I am for improving SP and if that means dropping MP so be it

    20 46.51%
  • b) I am for improving SP but MP is nice to have

    13 30.23%
  • c) I think MP adds to the game and would want it kept

    2 4.65%
  • d) I think MP should be improved

    7 16.28%
  • e) GAH!

    1 2.33%
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: TW5 SP vs MP

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Yun Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    622

    Default TW5 SP vs MP

    This is based on a precedence set over at Stardock the developers of the Galactic Civs 2 game posted a lengthy argument for why they would never be including an MP component with Galactic Civs 2. The primary reason they gave was that to devote resources and time to MP would diminish the resources available for the SP game and they believed the numbers who would actually play MP didnt warrent any investment in it in its own right, and the community agreed this should not be at the cost of the SP game.

    http://forums.galciv2.com/?forumid=162&aid=98074

    So as a bit of a hypothical
    Given the problems which some people believe the MP game has. I think its reasonable to assume that the piggybacking of MP onto Total war games does have an impact on the SP game and visa vie. Were CA to say for the next title they were considering dropping MP completely to concentrate on improving the SP game, and to enable them to commit more resources to the SPTW game.


    How would you feel?

    edit - your right thx for that - damn cant seem to change to poll title - ce la vie
    Last edited by Yun Dog; 06-21-2007 at 04:22.
    Quote Originally Posted by pevergreen View Post
    its pevergeren.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO