View Poll Results: Summer Campaign Round 3 Napoleonic Generals

Voters
40. This poll is closed
  • Napoleon

    17 42.50%
  • Frederick the Great

    5 12.50%
  • Wellington

    11 27.50%
  • Robert E. Lee

    7 17.50%
Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: Round 3-Napoleonic Bracket

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #25
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Round 3-Napoleonic Bracket

    Well, Napoleon obviously. It's not called Napoleonic era for nothing, d'oh.
    Though one have to admit that his opponents were all in all, quite poor leaders and generals (with some exceptions like Wellington).
    He had little contenders during his battle for Europe, and that precisely explains why most of his defeats and ultimately, his fall, were caused not by large scale battles, but by guerilla and exhaustion wars.

    He lacked International statesmanship utterly.
    Quite untrue, half of Europe joined him in his fight against the other half. How is that a lack of statesmanship ?

    The fact that so many coalitions were brought against him so many times is ample example of that.
    Or maybe the fact that all these kings, archidukes and tsar were affraid of him ? Most likely because, despite his lust for power and his title of Emperor, Napoleon was a son of the French Revolution. You know, when people started to cut their Kings' heads. He brought with him ideas of democracy, freedom of opinion, republic and what not (though Imperial France wasn't a democratic republic, as I'm sure you would have pointed out).

    He posessed better commanders that any other leader at the time.
    Arguable, a few were indeed brillants, many were totally overrated. Most of those betrayed him when things turned bad.

    Stupidly invaded Russia, what an idiot, obviuosly his head ad grown too large
    How is that stupid ? May I remind you that back then, Russia wasn't considered undefeatable ? It's precisely Napoleon's failure (and Hitler's one) that gave birth to this myth.

    According to you, Napoleon was just an idiot, with little charisma, that sucked at leading his men to war, but who somehow achieved to rule over Europe and to have all european monarchs bow to him, just, well, cause he had some luck ? How objective that is
    It's quite funny seeing how some people (mostly brits) have trouble dealing with Napoleon :D

    Yeah, Wellington was a great general, saying otherwise would be stupid. But ranking him higher than a man who ruled most of Europe for more than a decade ? C'mon, if that's not a propaganda coup, what else is ?
    Last edited by Meneldil; 07-02-2007 at 09:35.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO