Just wondering, what exactly are the benefits of using this formation? Does it increase fire rate, make them less vulnerable to enemy missile fire etc?
Just wondering, what exactly are the benefits of using this formation? Does it increase fire rate, make them less vulnerable to enemy missile fire etc?
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
They're harder to hit, but have a reduced rate of fire, and a reduction in accuracy. Basically the only use for it is to piss people off
Not too sure about this one but gunpowder units seem to take a lessened effect on accuracy as do arrow units. Have not actually tested but it seems to not drop their accuracy as much as archer units at least. I personally have hardly ever used shooting circle.
Tschüß!
Erich
![]()
Things are getting better. Well, not as good as yesterday, but definitely better than tomorrow! ~Old Russian Joke
I utilized the stance sparingly, thinking it would decrease reception of enemy missiles. The way I used my armies it mattered only little whether it was used or not.
Emotion, passions, and desires are, thus peace is not.
Emotion: you have it or it has you.
---
Pay heed to my story named The Thief in the Mead Hall.No.
---
Check out some of my music.
I think it's most useful when the opponent is using archers ensconced behind a heavier troop formation. Arrows fired overhead tend to land in a scattered cloud around the target -- the shooting circle has your missile cavalry spinning near the outside of the cloud, in a formation that has a relatively low Surface Area/Volume ratio, reducing the probability that any one unit is going to be hit by the foe's missiles.
Bookmarks