i agree i think juli are the hardest, as the scipi i always take greece and try to nick any other of the provinces the other roman factions head for, and no one is going to attack africa so you are free to attack other areas.
i agree i think juli are the hardest, as the scipi i always take greece and try to nick any other of the provinces the other roman factions head for, and no one is going to attack africa so you are free to attack other areas.
"its funny when you think that if no war had existed there could be no peace ,without war, peace has no oppsite,but in the end it means nothing but what is a idea but words that blossoms in the minds of fickle or brilliant men that give them purpose and to them a meaning
." William Anderson 1781
So, Julii is the winner, I agree.
Hard to say. (no pun intended) I think it depends on the game and circumstances, and what difficulty level you play at. There's just enough randomness in the AI from game to game that it can change circumstancecs for your Roma faction.
When I take the Scipii, I too, try to move in on the Brutii action in Greece. If you're going to do some serious empire building, you need Corinth with it's wonder that supports public order. It behooves the Julii to slip down to Greece, too, if possible. Take Crete and slip over to Rhodes to get that wonder, too, that supports sea trade.
I am amazed at how profitable the Julii can make the Gaulish provinces. And given their five star city cluster of Arminium, Patavium, Arretium, Segesta, and Mediolanum, one can really rake in the cash. Throw in Segestica, Salona, Caralis, Marseilles, and Narbo, and you've got 10-11 cities in close proximity that provide the backbone of your finances.
Where the Julii miss out is they have no temples that enhance the military character and capabilities of their units.
The Scipii, if they plant a Temple of Neptune in Syracuse add to their naval capability, and that can be important in the later game. Couple that with a temple of Vulcan in Messana, and Sicily becomes a serious arsenal of quality units.
The consensus in this thread is probably correct - the Julii, by virtue of being geographically further from the 'wonders' and short-changed a bit on the temples - may be the most difficult to play. But I think the Gauls are a bit easier adversary than the Carthaginians and the Macedonians.
But the, I actually enjoy playing the Julii more than the other two rome factions. whatever . . . .
Sick'em wardogs!!
"Those who would sacrifice a generation to realize an ideal are the enemies of mankind."
-- Eric Hoffer
"Everyone after he has been fully trained, will be like His teacher." -- Luke 6:40
I agree with Pizzaguy!!!
It really depends on how you play the faction. I have found that each Roman faction can be easy or hard depending on your tactics and where you mount your attacks. Also you must change your tactics as you face the different opponents.
Agreed, but with the addition of Balares. I have never had a financial problem(s) playing as Julii. And once roads are paved the european cities make decent money too.Originally Posted by Guyus Germanicus
True, BUT they have temples that give the 'strategist' trait to your generals, I like that better. I've had it give me up to +3 command stars, add good attacker/defender, and a couple stars from retinue and it makes it very easy to get 10 star Generals.Originally Posted by Guyus Germanicus
Also, IIRC, one of the temples makes you more popular with the senate, although that might be Scipii
Fredericus Erlach, Overseer of Genoa, Count of Ajaccio in exile, 4th elector of Bavaria.
Does anyone know which temples^^?
I can't remeber right now, but will check and get back to you.
Last edited by TosaInu; 09-03-2007 at 19:16.
Fredericus Erlach, Overseer of Genoa, Count of Ajaccio in exile, 4th elector of Bavaria.
Bookmarks