Keep it polite! Although it indeed is impossible for the average family to trace their line that far back, the nobility of England may be able to, since IIRC their possesions shortly after the conquest were noted down in the domesday book.
Keep it polite! Although it indeed is impossible for the average family to trace their line that far back, the nobility of England may be able to, since IIRC their possesions shortly after the conquest were noted down in the domesday book.
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
I myself am not a hundred percent sure about everything. Yes, my family was noble but slowly lost that status, and by the 15th. After Hastings, thinks become considerably murky. The sad thing is I just jumped on such a wagon, and have really no way to find out much more about it. I am currently working on it though. My grandmother had started it, and I currently trying to validate it. I wish I had more help in such an endaevor, and any help would be appreciative, although what could be supplied would probably not substantial. If I can remember correctly, my family's name was anglicized to "Seymour" after the Norman Conquest. Oh, and just for clarification, the Tuetonic Order/Russian line of my family was NOT during the Drang Noch Osten, and was during the 17th century.
I have been told that a member of our family who has spent years tracking down the family tree has discovered that a distant relative wads Lord Nelson's cabin boy (or some other type of personal help).
I can't validate this though as I haven't seen her work, but kinda nifty if true. I'm aiming to meet this person soon though, so if I do I'll let you know!
Other than that my grandfather was a member of the Australian Light Horse regiment in WW1, which is famous for (I believe) the last successful cavalry charge - in Bersheba.
The name Seymour is an Anglicised French-Norman name. It is derived from 'Saint-Maur', a town in Normandy. Its lord conquered England together with William the Conquerer.Originally Posted by YourLordandConqueror
Maybe you really can genealogically trace your ancestry back to Norman nobility. Maybe your family at one point adopted the name of Seymour. And much later somebody else in your family read up about the meaning of the surname and without further investigation accepted the 'Norman noble' family origin explanation, for all the glamour it brings.
Actually, few noble families slowly lose their status. This usually means that somebody does genealogical research, discovers noble blood somewhere, and this later gets turned into a family legend. 'Once we were noblemen...'Yes, my family was noble but slowly lost that status,
There is probably not a single family in Europe without multiple infusions of noble blood. Such is the nature of genetic diffusion. You have two parents, four grandparents, eight...sixteen....thirty-two etcetera. Go back a thousand years, and you have 2^40 ancestors.
So you probably do have French-Norman ancestors. In fact, one would be hard pressed to find a single Briton without any.
I'd debate that point. there are so many potential different genetic inputs to a "Briton" that it is quite possible not to have Norman blood. the Normans were a relatively small group who seized power (and many of them were non-Norman mercenaries). It would be quite possible to have a mix of saxon, cletic and norse (but not specifically norman) blood.Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
If you go to the extremities of the UK the chances become higher as the Norman nobility had relatively little impact in Cornwall or the Highlands of Scotland although somewhat mor ein Wales and Ireland.
Old warriors know more tricks!
I know where MY noble blood came from - my great, great, great grandmother was a serving maid and was fired from the "big house" after dropping the Lord's distaff. Alas the family grapevine did not preserve the identity of the Lord in question... Every time I see the House of Lords I wonder who's sitting in 'my' seat![]()
Last news I saw of genetic studies of the Brits suggested that we are still predominantly of the pre-Celtic/Saxon/Norse/Norman stock, as with most invaders they brought their culture and language but didn't really replace the genetic stock. As such we are more related to Basques than most of our conquerors, although I don't doubt quite a few family lines will have been preserved from then. Interestingly, at the genetic level, the Welsh and Cornish are NOT distinguishable from the English.
ANCIENT: TW
A mod for Medieval:TW (with VI)
Discussion forum thread
Download A Game of Thrones Mod v1.4
that's strange as it doesn't match the last study I saw which said a clear difference could be seen between the North and South of England - broadly following the line of what was the Danelaw and that there WAS a clear difference between Cornwall, Celtic Scotland and Wales.Originally Posted by macsen rufus
Just shows that even academics can't agree on anything! Who know what is true ...... but what we do know is that we are one almighty great mix genetically.
Oh, and i can believe about us being related to the Basques because from my experience living here in Spain they are the most "english-like" - healthy love of beer being one major similarity![]()
Last edited by Don Esteban; 07-02-2007 at 11:28.
Old warriors know more tricks!
That's what I call real scientific proofhealthy love of beer being one major similarity![]()
ANCIENT: TW
A mod for Medieval:TW (with VI)
Discussion forum thread
Download A Game of Thrones Mod v1.4
I guess you're about on target there. I know someone who has some ancestors with the last name Allen. Related to Scots called Alan? Not at all. His ancestors are from Greece. They fled to America because they weren't welcome in Turkey anymore (though Turks deny that anything bad was going on at allOriginally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
) and wanted a name that Americans could pronounce.
Of course, what with one thing and another, who knows? His Allen ancestors may have had ancestors from Scotland named Alan.
In those simple times there was a great wonder and mystery in life. Man walked in fear and solemnity, with Heaven very close above his head, and Hell below his very feet. God's visible hand was everywhere, in the rainbow and the comet, in the thunder and the wind. The Devil too raged openly upon the earth; he skulked behind the hedge-rows in the gloaming; he laughed loudly in the night-time; he clawed the dying sinner, pounced on the unbaptized babe, and twisted the limbs of the epileptic. A foul fiend slunk ever by a man's side and whispered villainies in his ear, while above him there hovered an angel of grace . . .
Arthur Conan Doyle
Bookmarks