Quite strange bug

**Didz** · 07-07-2007, 12:57

Hi Per Ole,

This occurs when the game gives you a diplomatic mission to annex a settlement and you respond by sending an army. A similar result occurs if the game gives you a mission to murder an enemy general with an assassin and you kill them in battle instead.

Not so much a bug as a stubborn attitude towards the method used to acheive the goal.

**Per Ole** · 07-07-2007, 23:00

my bad, sorry :P

**Budwise** · 07-08-2007, 21:17

I think its a little extreme as well but I believe its there to expand your playing style. For instance to assasinate a person you could just kill them in battle but by assasinating him you would have to apply other tactics to do it.

**WhiskeyGhost** · 07-08-2007, 23:38

if only they could add in a ton of new quests, like perhaps some spy missions, or some "Defeat this Enemy Army" kinds would be nice too. Of course, it would also be neat to see a "Soldiers demand a brothel in XXX" which if failed would result in a penalty of losing some troops garrisoned there

**hoetje** · 07-08-2007, 23:53

I totally agree Whiskeyghost,however we might get into a situation then where we are fully dependant to these quest and become 'slaves' of the game... I just mean we might lose our freedom, our own chosen style of playing,when the game bombards us with tons of quests like that.

But still,it's a good idea that should give CA people food for thought :)

**Slug For A Butt** · 07-09-2007, 03:01

@WhiskeyGhost. I personally think that is a fine idea. more interesting too than the Council Of Nobles (or whatever they are called) telling you take a settlement or they'll be displeased with you. More tangible results if you succeed or fail, I like it.