Killing the messenger - the death of UNMOVIC

[KafirChobee]

"The US invasion of Iraq proved that the UN's intel - overruled by the Bush administration - had indeed been correct: Saddam no longer had WMDs." [Newsweek, July 16 - edition] Neither the Bushys or the Blairys were thrilled - especially since their conspiriatorial compliance with proving that Saddam had WMDs and ergo we had to invade Iraq to save the free world from his insanity (not theirs - which is what we ought to have been concerned about) failed. And, now we have Mothers without their sons, sons without their fathers ... etc.

Well, we certainly can't allow a professional group of inspectors running around willing to disprove "the" Superpower" and his lap dog wrong ... can we? So, they killed the only organization with the professionals and ability to actually prove or disprove whether or nor a nation is abiding by the rules of the UN ... sorta forgot about "the greatleader" over there in N.Korea - whom is suppose to assure they will stay within the guidelines established by the UN (the superpower).
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2...-weapons_N.htm

Now, Yahoo has a pretty decent story there - but it's a bugaboo to link it - for me, so try the Google (everything you type HomeLandSecurity knows) and type UNMOVIC ... you'll get it.

The vindictiveness of this is not what bothers me. What does is the arrogance and ignorance of it - how does this improve our ability to combat rouge nations or terrorism? Not that I have any doubt about destroying the only organization that knew how to inspect or find WMDs in rogue nations is a bad thing - I mean when it allows the Superpower and its lapdog to say anything, what could possilbly be wrong with that?

God bless America (and Britain) - screw the truth.