Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

  1. #1
    I stole it from a stupid Iceni Member Shieldmaiden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England, Lincolnshire.
    Posts
    340

    Default Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    Just out of curiousity - does somebody know the engine differences between Rome and Alexander (1.5 and 1.9 respectively)? I notice it doesn't use BI features, and its performance on my PC feels a mite slower...
    "Now, once more I must ride with my knights, to defend what was and the dream of what could be..."

    - King Arthur, Excalibur

  2. #2
    Just your average Senior Member Warmaster Horus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Besancon, France: a stepping stone to greatness. I hope.
    Posts
    2,940

    Default Re: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    I think there might be something about units... Either unit amount, or... Something related to modding, perhaps?

    Honestly, I don't know.
    The Throne Room: "Less a forum, more a way of life." Econ21
    Don't hesitate to visit the Mead Hall! A little more reading, a little less shouting, please.
    Join the latest greatest installement of mafia games: Capo di Tutti Capi!
    Check out the Gahzette!
    By the by, are you interested in helping out the Gahzette? Think you could be a writer, reporting on the TW or Org community? Then check the Gahzette Thread or drop me a PM!


    Back.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    All known answers are here: GUIDE: Specifics of Modding Alexander - TW

    Norman Invasion - The fate of England lies in your hands...

    Viking Invasion II - Unite Britain in the best TW campaign ever!

    Gods and Fighting Men: Total War - Enter the Mists of Myth in Ancient Ireland

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shieldmaiden
    Just out of curiousity - does somebody know the engine differences between Rome and Alexander (1.5 and 1.9 respectively)? I notice it doesn't use BI features, and its performance on my PC feels a mite slower...
    Yes, it was (is) dramatically slower on my computer. In fact, it seemed to be perform worse than M2TW.

    I did not notice any favourable differences in the engine and there was one unfavourable one (I forget the details - something like the camera being reverting back to an old view point if you made an action while switching to another unit).

  5. #5
    I stole it from a stupid Iceni Member Shieldmaiden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England, Lincolnshire.
    Posts
    340

    Default Re: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    Thank you all

    Yes, it was (is) dramatically slower on my computer.
    Hmm, I'm using a crap GeForce 7300 LE myself, but its perfectably playable . I tried the MTW2 Demo and its certainly better FPS than that
    Last edited by Shieldmaiden; 07-15-2007 at 12:02.
    "Now, once more I must ride with my knights, to defend what was and the dream of what could be..."

    - King Arthur, Excalibur

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Rome & Alexander - engine differences?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shieldmaiden
    Hmm, I'm using a crap GeForce 7300 LE myself, but its perfectably playable . I tried the MTW2 Demo and its certainly better FPS than that
    You could be right - I am talking about my general impression, not a careful comparison.

    Off topic, the M2TW demo performance varies very much with the settings (my performance improved dramatically with shadows off, shader 1 or some such). The full game plays much better than the demo too.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO