Wooooooo comparing your penis to you appendix never seen anything like that before.Originally Posted by HoreTore
Lemur I love you but you really need to shake this whole circumscison thing. Its getting werid
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
What, I'm not allowed to add another fixation to the Backroom? Not every thread can be about abortion, religion, gun control, politics and the evil of Micronesia. Somebody's gotta stand up for the wang.Originally Posted by Strike For The South
I'll take a snip thread over a gun thread any day...Originally Posted by Lemur
@Ichigo: Yeah, I kinda understood that... I contemplated a joke in response, but they were all to manly for me...![]()
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Lemur. Stop.
This topic is like radiation. It may not bring as much "badness" to the backroom as many other topics, but any addition of "badness" can universally be considered bad. So stop it.
My point of view... as an atheist.
I believe anyone who feels like cutting in their penis should be allowed to do so.
However, doing it on someone who is newly born and doesnt have a say is in my view considered to be torture and should be prosecuted.
i have a friend whos parents are jewish... he however doesnt really fall for teh godstuff, and he kind of hate them for having cut his penis to shreds.
Mainly because the girls go "wtf is that" when they see it...
And of course, it makes the penis less sensitive, and I and probably any other man kind of likes a sensitive penis, for various reasons;)
So feel free to cut away, but forcing it on someone should be illegal.
EDIT: For me the question boils down to: who does the penis belong to? The child or the parents? For me the answer is simple.
Last edited by Kadagar_AV; 07-21-2007 at 03:12.
Doesn't the wang stand up for itself?Originally Posted by Lemur
Thank you! Thank you! I'll be here all week.
Just what this thread needs - a stand up comic...Originally Posted by TinCow
...apparently on Viagra.Originally Posted by TinCow
Last edited by Gregoshi; 07-24-2007 at 18:05.
This space intentionally left blank
But with the rise of new Technology, in twenty or so years the damage done by circumcision may not be so much of a big deal. You can have your cake and eat it too (though I suggest against that).
Saaaay, what do you know that the rest of us don't ? I sure hope that this Technology you speak of is not in the same boat with the one hinted at in all the emails for enlarging my manhood that I've been getting...Originally Posted by Wakizashi
Therapy helps, but screaming obscenities is cheaper.
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
![]()
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
What, has no one mentioned the secret handshake, the blood sacrifices and the protocols of Zion yet?
![]()
The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott
I was born with a foreskin, cleaning the whole area is part of my daily hygine ritual, to be honest I can't imagine being comfortable in pants without it.
Besides, next time I have to dive out of a window naked and run down the street I have a funny feeling it will elicit fewer screams in it's current state. It also won't get so damb cold.
As far as cancer, well if a woman has her breasts and nipples removed that removes the chance of cancer completely.
Sound like a good idea? I mean, it's not like women need them in the modern age, is it?
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
My short response follows:
I see no gain in removing the male genital foreskin nor do I see gain in a general belief, religion, or habitude, in doing so. One advantage I detect is possible increased easiness of cleaning. And perhaps there is the possibility of less sensitivity? If true, this could be regarded as some kind of advantage in certain situations.
Circumcision, disregarding Jews, Christians, or whomever applicable... why? Good day.
Emotion, passions, and desires are, thus peace is not.
Emotion: you have it or it has you.
---
Pay heed to my story named The Thief in the Mead Hall.No.
---
Check out some of my music.
Uhm, the point was unnecessary surgery...Originally Posted by Ichigo
![]()
Anyway, as for the AIDS-argument, there's really only one thing to say:
WEAR A FREAKIN' CONDOM! GEEZ!!
It's not hard, you open the pack, rip one off, open it as the package says, put it on the tip of the penis and roll it back. Then you squeeze out the air of the air bubble at the tip. That wasn't so hard, now was it? Oh, and do remember to stop humping once it's filled.
I don't really see how circumcision will work against HIV, as a condom(used correctly) is near 100% secure. Circumcision is only safer than not using a condom.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
It's also worth noting that the studies showing that circumcision helps stop the spread of AIDS were all conducted in places where dry sex is popular. I would be much more convinced by a study conducted in a first world nation.Originally Posted by HoreTore
Bookmarks