Does removing the foreskin in any way limit an average male's ability to perform and/or enjoy sex less than an uncut male?
Does removing the foreskin in any way limit an average male's ability to perform and/or enjoy sex less than an uncut male?
Unknown. The only thing I can think of would be to conduct a large statistical study comparing the incidence of sexual dysfunction among circumcised and uncircumcised men. But even that would be problematic, since you're depending on honest answers from guys about their sexual performance.
Maybe a breakdown of Viagra prescriptions, controlling for size of each population? That would be a little less subjective. Interesting question, and hard to answer.
Seems to me cutting something off is removing that part from the eqasion completely, if less to work with means less stymulisation.
Yeah, you get my drift.
Like I said, I can't imagine my little man being in my underwear and being comfortable without my foreskin to protect him. If that doesn't bother guys without foreskins I'm inclined to think the snip has a negative impact.
Although, that might translate into a positive impact on your lovemaking.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
There is no comparable frame of reference between the cut and uncut, at least for us Joes on the street. So short of us asking each other "how can you live like that?", there's naught we can do but wonder or read medical journals.
Heaven forbid this ever become an issue for presidential politics.![]()
This space intentionally left blank
Bookmarks