I was not too serious about that, but in fact the armies of Napoleon spread the ideas of NATION and FREEDOM all over Europe.I don't think you can blame it on Napoleon Bonaparte
Sad, but true. Most of the German Liberals (not all though), which demanded right of selfdetermination and national unity for Germany did not care about the rights of other people if it comes to the discussion of annex countries. I think the mixture of liberalism and nationalism was bad, absurd and dangerous.About Germany. I recall the discussion at that time and I have huge doubts about the future of this movement - the concept of Greater Germany was born after all and despite declared cooperation, support and united front against monarchs in places such as Greater Poland ( at that time in Prussia as semi-autonomous Duchy of Poznan) we see new nationalistic conflicts starting.
I think there would have been some differences. The militarism then was quite week and only limited to Prussia. With the foundation of Germany by the people there would hardly have been something like that. And even in Weimar there was a strong military. In the end the Republic was lead by a bunch of generals.The german movements were similar to Weimar liberal governments - non militarisitc, but very nationalistic and not willing to give up an inch of territory Prussia had before the revolutions.
I think Germany would have been less nationalistsic if the foundation of the state would have been by the people, not by the noblemen and military.
Plus, Germany would have had a kind of democratic tradition.
Bookmarks