I was noticing something during one of my campaigns that I wondered if anyone else noticed. In Brandybarrel's FAUST guide he talks about units that are 'Free City Garrison.' In the guide, pretty much any unit that is a militia unit qualifies as a free city garrison. Hence, the unit does not get charged to your faction's troop carrying costs when it is garrisoned.
But it appears that those unit types that qualify for free garrison status have to be recruited in the city they are garrisoned. If they are recruited in that city you can literally fill up the 20 openings for garrison troops with them and the entire garrison is a freebie. Your faction is not charged for them. If, however, they are moved out of that city, or they are moved into another city different from where they were recruited, they are charged to your faction at the normal carry-cost rate.
Also, since you can not recruit militia units from castles, no castles can be garrisoned for free. A bummer, but apparently that's the case. For example, the Mamluks start out with two units of militia spearmen in Gaza. They are not free of garrison charges since they were not recruited from Gaza (and couldn't be since apparently no castle can recruit militia units.)
Also, if you have any question as to what units are being charged to your faction in any given city, you can run your cursor over a unit in a city, and the unit will tell you whether it's a free garrison charge or not.
So when you're looking at the FAUST chart on which units are freebies, you have to remember that those units that are free garrison units have to be recruited from the city they are being garrisoned at before they are qualified to be freebies. And, you can't remove them from garrison duty, apparently, to another city and get them garrisoned for free.
If anyone has noticed anything different, feel free to chime in here. If I've missed something, Guild veterans are welcome to correct any mistatements here. But that's how the game appears to work to me. Forgive me if I'm repeating an observation that was already brought up in another thread.
I going to assume Brandybarrel has already noticed this qualification, and I'm just a Johnny-come-lately.
Bookmarks