Personally I don't think the average american citizen gives a rat's ass if anyone in the world outside the U.S is living freedom and democracy. While the war in Afganistan can be somehow justified in getting rid off an openly terrorists supporting nation, their war in Iraq has nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with oil. Oil they now control. If that isn't fighting a war for commercial interests and resources, what is?Originally Posted by Foot
Of all current nations in existence the U.S reminds me mostly of the money grabbing commercial empire. Just take a look at all the different customs and tariffs they have erected to "safeguard" the domestic industry. All the while they keep complaining that certain nations like China aren't opening their markets to "free trade" by having "illegal" customs against foreign companies.![]()
Their hypocracy stinks all the way to my country. And a live one big ocean and a smaller sea removed from them.
Persia is an example in expedience and practicality. You got an empire that spans roughly the know civilized world. In all that territory you got hundreds if not thousands of different peoples, cultures, languages, customs and religions. How do you manage something that big?
The Persians were happy in letting it run itself trough a large number of vassal rulers who had relatively free hands in running their respective territories. All the King of Kings asks, is that you contribute to the general welfare by paying tribute. A lot of which goes to pay the army that kept them in power.
Both the Diadochi and the Romans had another method. The Diadochi tried making the world greek by setting up colonies troughout their lands inhabited by greeks. Hoping that the culture that was at the top would gradually seep trough to the people beneath. Didn't work as well as they hoped. Even so it left a Greek legacy all over the Middle East.
The Romans were more thourough in making the whole Empire Roman. Taxation, administration, legal systems, agriculture, religion, infrastructure. Everything was exported from Rome to every corner of the Roman world. When the people who have previously been thinking of themselves as Greek, Phoenician, Egyptian, Celt or Numidian start thinking of themselves as Roman, you've won.
I know Athens was expansionistic. But unlike Cartage I don't think the sole reason for their expansion was money and profit.
Bookmarks