Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Obama and Pakistan

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Evil Sadist Member discovery1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Urbana, IL
    Posts
    2,551

    Default Obama and Pakistan

    Woah, Obama says he'd be willing to go after targets in Pakistan without consulting their government

    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...-8-2007_pg7_16

    Comments? Seems like a good way to destabilize our ally, although his openness is impressive.


    GoreBag: Oh, Prole, you're a nerd's wet dream.

  2. #2
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Obama and Pakistan

    Quote Originally Posted by discovery1
    Woah, Obama says he'd be willing to go after targets in Pakistan without consulting their government.
    As I understood it, he never said anything about "not consulting." His line was that if we had actionable intelligence, and Pakistan refused to act, we would. A subtle distinction, but an important one.

    "Destabilize our ally"? Interesting way of looking at things. OBL's been camping out in their Road Warrior-esque backyard since 2002 onward. They can't or won't do anything about it. While we've been distracting ourselves in Iraq, the man behind the murders of thousands of Americans has been a resident of a country that receives a billion dollars a year of U.S. aid.

    Allies, indeed.

    -edit-

    Actual quote, just so's we're all on the same page:

    "I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me make this clear. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and (Pakistani) President (Pervez) Musharraf will not act, we will."
    Last edited by Lemur; 08-05-2007 at 04:48.

  3. #3
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Obama and Pakistan

    The fact that he'd do so is no surprise- I think most other candidates would as well. The "rookie" mistake in all of this is publicly announcing that you'll do so. By publicly announcing that you intend to violate Pakistan's sovereignty if they don't do what you want them to fuels anti-American sentiments in the country and will only make it harder to get more cooperation with the Pakistani government.

    The criticism as I understand it isn't that he would do so (although the kook left fringe may criticize him there too), but that he's openly blabbing about it just to try and look tough on security. I'm no Obama fan, and this doesn't help that view at all.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  4. #4
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Obama and Pakistan

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou
    I'm no Obama fan, and this doesn't help that view at all.
    Oh, more of a Hillary man, then? Little did I know you were seriously considering Obama, um, ever.

  5. #5
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Obama and Pakistan

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur
    Oh, more of a Hillary man, then? Little did I know you were seriously considering Obama, um, ever.
    Atm, I honestly think Hillary might be the most competent of the Democrat candidates.... sad, I know.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  6. #6
    Member Member KafirChobee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Local Yokel, USA
    Posts
    1,020

    Default Re: Obama and Pakistan

    Lemur, well .... you got it right. All the candidates (RNC or DNC) would agree with Obama - but, it is one of the Goldwater moments where the less truth told - the better to attack an opponent.

    When Goldwater ran (1964) i was 17, married with a child and of course had no voice. Except to pass out his opinion - which was: If we go to war then use every means possible to protect our troops (cause I knew I would be one) and achieve victory, or withdraw and negotiate with the Vietcong - the enemy (Uncle Ho, whom the USA had made agreements with for them to fight the Japs in WWII - which Truman chose to ignore because of Marshall). Regardless, Obama sounds like the common mans Goldwater in regard to asking the military to attack our real enemy and not one conjectured.

    Basic rules of warfare for a nation:
    1) to protect borders, when attacked.
    2) to protect economic interests when diplomatic means fail (ie, Japs attacked PH for that reason).
    3) to acquire, anything they a leader believes he can get away with - Hitler, Dubya, etc.
    Beyond those principles we enter into the factors of imperialism and the spin to justify a nations grab for $$$$$$$, land and prestige.

    Not that Obama is above any of these factors - look to whom is actually sponsoring him, but to each fool his own.

    I like what Obama says - am just curious about whether it is real, or if he is being led (ala carte Reagan).
    To forgive bad deeds is Christian; to reward them is Republican. 'MC' Rove
    The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    ]Clowns to the right of me, Jokers to the left ... here I am - stuck in the middle with you.

    Save the Whales. Collect the whole set of them.

    Better to have your enemys in the tent pissin' out, than have them outside the tent pissin' in. LBJ

    He who laughs last thinks slowest.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO